CPU Comparison

Intel Core i7-8560U vs Core i5-11300H

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-8560U is a highly efficient mobile processor introduced as part of the Whiskey Lake lineup, specifically engineered for thin-and-light ultrabooks. Featuring four cores and eight threads, it brought mainstream quad-core performance to the ultra-low-power segment. Operating at a base frequency of 1.8 GHz, it can dynamically boost up to 4.6 GHz when thermal headroom permits, delivering snappy burst performance for everyday tasks and moderate workloads. With a 15-watt thermal design power, it balances battery longevity with processing capability. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 handles basic display outputs and light multimedia tasks, though it is not suited for intensive gaming. This CPU marked a significant step in Intel's 8th generation strategy, offering increased core counts over previous ultra-low-voltage dual-core designs, thereby reshaping user expectations for portable computing power. Released in late 2018, it became a staple in premium business and consumer laptops, providing a reliable computing experience for professionals on the go who require multitasking capabilities without sacrificing portability.

Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-8560U
4C / 8T4.6 GHz15 W
7.5
Full review
Intel · Core i5
Core i5-11300H
4C / 8T4.4 GHz28 W
7.5
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
Mobile
Generation
Core i7 (Whiskey Lake)
11th Gen
Launched
2018
2021
Status
End-of-life
Active
Codename
Whiskey Lake-U
Tiger Lake-H
Series
Core i7
Core i5
Family
8th Generation
Tiger Lake
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Core i5-10200H
Successor
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i5-12450H

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
8
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
TDP
15 W
28 W
Architecture
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U
Tiger Lake-H
Process Node
14nm
10nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3, DDR4
DDR4
Memory Speed
2400 MT/s
DDR4-3200
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
64 GB
64 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
Intel BGA 1528
Intel BGA 1449
PCIe Version
Gen 3
PCIe 4.0
PCIe Lanes
16
20
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i7-8560U80

Handles heavy multitasking and office applications effortlessly.

Core i5-11300HBest84

High clock speeds ensure smooth office and browsing performance.

Gaming

Intel Core i7-8560U30

Only suitable for very light or older games on low settings.

Core i5-11300HBest65

80EU graphics are good for light gaming, but fall short of the 11320H's 96EU.

Virtualization

Intel Core i7-8560U65

Can run light VMs, but limited by 15W power constraints.

Core i5-11300HBest68

4 cores can handle light VMs but will bottleneck quickly.

Efficiency

Intel Core i7-8560UBest95

Outstanding power-to-performance ratio for battery life.

Core i5-11300H72

28W TDP runs warmer than U-series but is manageable in thin chassis.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i7-8560ULimited
  • No dedicated AI hardware
  • Basic CPU inference only
Core i5-11300HModerate
  • Intel GNA 2.0 for AI-accelerated background tasks

Content Creation

Intel Core i7-8560UFair
Basic Photo Editing1080p Video EditingAudio Production
Core i5-11300HModerate
PhotoshopLight 1080p Video Editing

Gaming

Intel Core i7-8560ULow
  • Relies on Intel UHD Graphics 620
  • Only suitable for indie or older titles
  • Not recommended for modern AAA gaming
Core i5-11300HCasual
  • 80EU Iris Xe is sufficient for Minecraft, Sims 4, and CS:GO
  • Not recommended for modern AAA games

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Low
Workstations
Moderate
Low
Content Creation
Moderate
Moderate
Virtualization
Moderate
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

Office Productivity
Excellent
Web Browsing
Excellent
Excellent
Programming
Very Good
1080p Video Playback
Excellent
Gaming
Poor
Everyday Productivity
Excellent
Casual Gaming
Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i7-8560U

Pros

  • Excellent power efficiency
  • Good burst performance
  • Quad-core multitasking
  • Widely supported in business laptops

Cons

  • Weak integrated graphics
  • Older 14nm process
  • Locked multiplier
  • Soldered to motherboard
Core i5-11300H

Pros

  • Good single-core performance
  • 28W TDP allows for sustained boosts
  • 80EU Iris Xe graphics
  • Supports PCIe 4.0
  • Solid choice for everyday ultrabooks

Cons

  • Only 4 cores and 8 threads
  • No DDR5 support
  • Slightly weaker graphics than the 11320H
  • Locked multiplier

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i7-8560U

Core i5-11300H

Our Verdict on Each

A capable quad-core mobile CPU that offers excellent battery life and sufficient power for everyday productivity, though it struggles with heavy rendering or modern gaming.

Best for: Purchasing a used, premium ultrabook for study or light office work.

Read the full review
Core i5-11300HRecommended

A capable 4-core chip that brought H-series performance to thin-and-light laptops, though outclassed by newer generations.

Best for: Budget thin-and-light laptops

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-8560U or Core i5-11300H?

For gaming, the Core i5-11300H leads with a gaming performance score of 65/100 among Intel Core i7-8560U and Core i5-11300H.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i7-8560U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-8560U (15 W), Core i5-11300H (28 W).

Do Intel Core i7-8560U and Core i5-11300H use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-8560U: Intel BGA 1528, Core i5-11300H: Intel BGA 1449), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i7-8560U posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-8560U (8,500), Core i5-11300H (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.