CPU Comparison
Core i7-6785R vs Intel Core i3-10325
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-6785R is a specialized desktop processor launched in May 2016 as part of the Skylake-R family. Built on a BGA package, it is soldered directly to the motherboard and primarily intended for All-in-One (AIO) systems, NUCs, and mini PCs. This 14nm quad-core CPU features Hyper-Threading, processing 8 threads simultaneously. It operates at a base clock of 3.3 GHz and boosts up to 3.9 GHz. Its standout feature is the inclusion of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, which features 128MB of embedded DRAM (eDRAM), offering significantly better graphics performance than standard Intel HD Graphics. With a 65W TDP, it balances capable processing with powerful integrated graphics. It supports dual-channel DDR4-2133 or DDR3L memory. The i7-6785R is a niche product, ideal for compact systems requiring strong graphical output without the space or power for a discrete GPU, though its BGA nature limits upgradability.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
The high boost clock makes everyday office tasks feel extremely responsive, though DDR4-2666 limits heavy data crunching.
Gaming
Slightly better single-core speed than the 10320, but still requires a discrete GPU and is bottlenecked by PCIe 3.0.
Virtualization
8 threads are usable for a light VM setup, but the 65W TDP limits sustained virtualization performance.
Efficiency
Average efficiency for 14nm. AMD's competing chips at this price point draw less power for similar or better multi-core output.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
No data
- No AI hardware acceleration
- Lacks modern AVX-512 instructions
- Not designed for AI workloads
Content Creation
No data
Gaming
No data
- UHD 630 is not for gaming
- CPU can handle budget dGPUs without major issues
- Lacks PCIe 4.0 for future GPU upgrades
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Powerful Iris Pro 580 integrated graphics
- 128MB eDRAM boosts CPU and GPU performance
- Low 65W TDP
- Good 3.9 GHz single-core performance
Cons
- Soldered BGA package (cannot be upgraded)
- Hard to source for consumers
- Only 4 cores
- Older 14nm process
Pros
- High 4.7 GHz boost clock for snappy responsiveness
- Official support for newer 500-series chipsets
- Intel SGX for enterprise security enclaves
- Efficient 65W power profile
- Flexible drop-in option for OEMs
Cons
- Launched after 11th-gen, making it immediately outdated
- DDR4-2666 memory speed severely limits performance
- Still uses PCIe 3.0
- OEM-focused, hard to find at retail
- More expensive at launch ($154) than vastly superior 11th-gen parts
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-6785R
- AMD A10-7890KRival
BGA Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-5775RRival
BGA Desktop
- AMD A12-9800Rival
BGA Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-5675RRival
BGA Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-6700Rival
Mainstream Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GAlt
Newer, socketed alternative with strong Vega graphics.
- Intel Core i7-7700Alt
Better clocks on a standard socket.
Intel Core i3-10325
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i3-10100Rival
Budget Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-10400Rival
Mid-Range Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 4300GRival
Budget Desktop APU
Offers a massive IPC uplift, PCIe 4.0, and DDR4-3200 support on the same LGA 1700 platform.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600Alt
Doubles the core count and offers significantly better multi-threaded performance for a similar price.
- Intel Core i5-11400Alt
A 6-core 11th-gen part that shares the 500-series chipset support but offers much better productivity performance.
- AMD Ryzen 3 4100Alt
A modern Zen 2-based chip that provides better efficiency and upgradeability on the AM4 platform.
Our Verdict on Each
A unique BGA desktop CPU with exceptional integrated graphics for its era. Perfect for small form factor builds where a discrete GPU isn't possible.
Best for: Buying a used NUC or AIO with this chip pre-installed
Read the full reviewA niche OEM stopgap that offered slight clock improvements and newer chipset support, but it was quickly outclassed by 11th-gen alternatives.
Best for: Buying an Intel Core i3-10325 for a custom PC build in today's market makes very little sense. If you are purchasing a pre-built desktop or a barebones system that already includes this processor, it remains a solid performer for office work, homeschooling, and general home use. The 4.7 GHz boost clock ensures that snappy day-to-day responsiveness is present. However, if you are sourcing parts individually, you should absolutely opt for the 11th-generation Core i3-12100 or the i5-11400. Those processors offer significantly better IPC, DDR4-3200 memory support, and PCIe 4.0, often at similar or lower price points. The i3-10325's DDR4-2666 memory limitation is its biggest liability, holding back both CPU and integrated graphics performance. Only consider this chip if you are upgrading a locked OEM system that specifically requires a 400 or 500-series compatible CPU with these exact power characteristics.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i7-6785R or Intel Core i3-10325?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-6785R comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Core i7-6785R or Intel Core i3-10325?
For gaming, the Intel Core i3-10325 leads with a gaming performance score of 30/100 among Core i7-6785R and Intel Core i3-10325.
Do Core i7-6785R and Intel Core i3-10325 use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Core i7-6785R: Intel BGA 1440, Intel Core i3-10325: LGA 1200), so each needs a compatible motherboard.