CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-6700TE vs Core i7-1366URE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-6700TE is a specialized embedded processor based on the 6th Generation Skylake architecture, engineered specifically for long-life cycle applications such as digital signage, kiosks, and industrial IoT devices. Distinguished by the 'TE' suffix, this chip guarantees extended availability, ensuring that system designers can rely on its consistent specifications for years. It features four cores and eight threads, operating at a base frequency of 2.4 GHz with a maximum turbo boost of 3.4 GHz. The processor maintains a strict 35-watt thermal design power, making it suitable for compact, fanless enclosures commonly used in industrial environments. Unlike standard desktop variants, the 6700TE exclusively supports DDR4 memory, reflecting its forward-looking design for stable embedded platforms. With 8 MB of L3 cache and Intel HD Graphics 530, it delivers reliable parallel processing and multimedia decoding capabilities, providing a robust foundation for unattended edge computing and ruggedized deployments where reliability is paramount.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles specialized industrial software efficiently.
Highly capable of running dedicated industrial control software efficiently.
Gaming
Not intended for gaming; HD 530 is insufficient for modern titles.
Not intended for gaming, though 80EU graphics can drive basic display outputs.
Virtualization
vPro makes it decent for light edge virtualization.
Excellent for running containerized edge applications and lightweight VMs.
Efficiency
Excellent efficiency for always-on embedded devices.
Optimized for 24/7 low-power operation in constrained thermal environments.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Relies on CPU for inference
- Capable of basic edge AI inference
- No dedicated NPU
- Relies on CPU and integrated GPU for processing
Content Creation
Gaming
- Uses Intel HD Graphics 530
- Suitable only for basic display output
- Not for gaming applications
- Iris Xe 80EU is strictly for display output and UI rendering
- Not designed for 3D gaming workloads
- Suitable for simple 2D industrial interfaces
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Intel vPro support
- Long lifecycle availability
- 35W TDP for fanless designs
- Good burst performance
Cons
- Expensive due to embedded market
- Weak integrated graphics
- Locked multiplier
- Older 14nm process
Pros
- Guaranteed long-term embedded lifecycle
- Soldered BGA package for vibration resistance
- Excellent power efficiency (15W base)
- Includes vPro for remote management
- Supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory
Cons
- Lower graphics performance (80EU vs 96EU)
- Permanently soldered, no upgrade path
- Lower max turbo frequency than consumer 1365U
- Overkill and hard to source for standard consumers
- Maximum power limited to 28W
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-6700TE
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-7700TERival
Embedded
- Intel Core i5-6500TERival
Embedded
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807BRival
Embedded
- Intel Atom x7-E3950Rival
Embedded
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2000Alt
More cores and better efficiency.
- Intel Xeon E-2176GAlt
Server-grade embedded alternative with ECC.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAlt
Modern desktop embedded alternative.
Core i7-1366URE
- AMD Ryzen Embedded 7735URival
Embedded
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546Rival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-1266URERival
Embedded
- Intel Atom x6425RERival
Embedded
- NXP i.MX 8 PlusRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-1365UAlt
Consumer equivalent with higher graphics performance and boost clocks.
- Intel Core i5-1366UREAlt
Lower cost alternative for embedded designs with less compute demand.
- AMD Ryzen Embedded 7040UAlt
Offers superior efficiency and AI capabilities for modern edge devices.
- Intel Core i7-12700EAlt
Desktop socketed alternative for industrial PCs needing more sustained power.
- Intel Core Ultra 7 165UAlt
Newer Meteor Lake embedded equivalent with dedicated NPU for AI workloads.
Our Verdict on Each
A robust embedded processor offering excellent longevity and vPro manageability for specialized industrial applications.
Best for: Designing a long-life medical or industrial edge device.
Read the full reviewA highly reliable embedded chip offering excellent long-term availability and efficient thermal management for industrial workloads.
Best for: Designing ruggedized edge servers or medical diagnostic carts
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-6700TE or Core i7-1366URE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-1366URE comes out ahead with a score of 8.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-6700TE or Core i7-1366URE?
For gaming, the Core i7-1366URE leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Core i7-6700TE and Core i7-1366URE.
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-1366URE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-6700TE (35 W), Core i7-1366URE (15 W).
Do Intel Core i7-6700TE and Core i7-1366URE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-6700TE: Intel Socket 1151, Core i7-1366URE: Intel BGA 1744), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Core i7-1366URE has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i7-6700TE (4 cores), Core i7-1366URE (10 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-6700TE posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-6700TE (6,000), Core i7-1366URE (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.