CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-6700TE vs Core i7-1185G7E
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-6700TE is a specialized embedded processor based on the 6th Generation Skylake architecture, engineered specifically for long-life cycle applications such as digital signage, kiosks, and industrial IoT devices. Distinguished by the 'TE' suffix, this chip guarantees extended availability, ensuring that system designers can rely on its consistent specifications for years. It features four cores and eight threads, operating at a base frequency of 2.4 GHz with a maximum turbo boost of 3.4 GHz. The processor maintains a strict 35-watt thermal design power, making it suitable for compact, fanless enclosures commonly used in industrial environments. Unlike standard desktop variants, the 6700TE exclusively supports DDR4 memory, reflecting its forward-looking design for stable embedded platforms. With 8 MB of L3 cache and Intel HD Graphics 530, it delivers reliable parallel processing and multimedia decoding capabilities, providing a robust foundation for unattended edge computing and ruggedized deployments where reliability is paramount.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles specialized industrial software efficiently.
Snappy single-thread performance handles specific industrial applications efficiently.
Gaming
Not intended for gaming; HD 530 is insufficient for modern titles.
Not intended for gaming, but Iris Xe can handle basic visualization loads easily.
Virtualization
vPro makes it decent for light edge virtualization.
Adequate for lightweight edge virtualization tasks.
Efficiency
Excellent efficiency for always-on embedded devices.
15W TDP ensures excellent performance per watt for embedded devices.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Relies on CPU for inference
- DLBoost accelerates AI tasks
- IPU 6.0 not present on this specific SKU
- Suitable for edge AI inference
Content Creation
Gaming
- Uses Intel HD Graphics 530
- Suitable only for basic display output
- Not for gaming applications
- Not targeted at gaming
- Graphics capable of basic 3D rendering
- Dependent on memory configuration
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Intel vPro support
- Long lifecycle availability
- 35W TDP for fanless designs
- Good burst performance
Cons
- Expensive due to embedded market
- Weak integrated graphics
- Locked multiplier
- Older 14nm process
Pros
- 15-year extended lifecycle support
- Low 15W base TDP
- Excellent single-thread performance
- Iris Xe 96EU graphics
- 10nm SuperFin efficiency
Cons
- Only 4 cores
- Low base clock (1.8 GHz)
- Limited PCIe lanes (4x)
- Not suitable for consumer builds
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-6700TE
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-7700TERival
Embedded
- Intel Core i5-6500TERival
Embedded
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807BRival
Embedded
- Intel Atom x7-E3950Rival
Embedded
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2000Alt
More cores and better efficiency.
- Intel Xeon E-2176GAlt
Server-grade embedded alternative with ECC.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAlt
Modern desktop embedded alternative.
Core i7-1185G7E
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718ERival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-10700TERival
Embedded
- AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544Rival
Embedded
- Intel Atom x6425ERival
Embedded
- NVIDIA Jetson Orin NanoRival
Edge AI
Lower cost embedded alternative.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546Alt
More cores for edge workloads.
- Intel Core i7-1185G7Alt
Consumer version with higher base TDP.
- Intel Xeon D-2700Alt
Server-class edge features.
Our Verdict on Each
A robust embedded processor offering excellent longevity and vPro manageability for specialized industrial applications.
Best for: Designing a long-life medical or industrial edge device.
Read the full reviewAn excellent embedded processor combining 10nm efficiency, strong single-thread performance, and long-term availability for critical infrastructure.
Best for: Designing medical, retail, or industrial equipment requiring long-term availability.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-6700TE or Core i7-1185G7E?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-1185G7E comes out ahead with a score of 8.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-6700TE or Core i7-1185G7E?
For gaming, the Core i7-1185G7E leads with a gaming performance score of 65/100 among Intel Core i7-6700TE and Core i7-1185G7E.
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-1185G7E has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-6700TE (35 W), Core i7-1185G7E (15 W).
Do Intel Core i7-6700TE and Core i7-1185G7E use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-6700TE: Intel Socket 1151, Core i7-1185G7E: BGA 1449), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-6700TE posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-6700TE (6,000), Core i7-1185G7E (5,800). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.