CPU Comparison
Core i7-5500U vs Intel Core i5-5350U
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-5500U is a low-power mobile processor introduced in early 2015, designed specifically for ultra-thin laptops and ultrabooks. Built on the 14nm Broadwell-U architecture, it succeeded the Haswell-U series, offering tangible improvements in energy efficiency and battery life. The chip features two physical cores and supports Hyper-Threading, allowing it to process four threads simultaneously. Operating at a base frequency of 2.4 GHz and boosting up to 3.0 GHz, it provides adequate performance for everyday computing tasks. It includes 4 MB of L3 cache and integrates Intel HD Graphics 5500, which handles basic media decoding and light gaming. With a highly efficient 15-watt thermal design power, the i7-5500U was instrumental in enabling the proliferation of thin-and-light laptops with all-day battery life. Though end-of-life and outclassed by modern standards, it was a highly capable and popular processor during its prime indeed.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles basic office tasks but struggles with heavy multitasking.
Handles basic document editing and web apps smoothly, but struggles with heavy multitasking.
Gaming
Only capable of running very old or lightweight 2D games.
Only capable of running very old or extremely lightweight 2D games.
Virtualization
Not recommended for VMs due to dual-core limitation.
Not recommended due to low core count and limited memory bandwidth.
Efficiency
Good efficiency for 2015, but poor compared to modern chips.
Still highly efficient for basic tasks, offering excellent battery life in older laptops.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- Dual-core limits any CPU-based AI inference
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Far too slow for local inference
Content Creation
Gaming
- Integrated HD 5500 is very weak
- Only suitable for 2D or old indie games
- No dedicated video memory
- Integrated HD 6000 lacks power for modern 3D titles
- Suitable for retro emulation and 2D indie games
- Shares system RAM, limiting frame rates
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent battery life for its era
- Low 15W TDP
- Good for basic office tasks
- Enabled thin-and-light designs
Cons
- Only 2 cores
- DDR3 memory only
- Weak integrated graphics
- Soldered to motherboard
- Struggles with modern web multitasking
Pros
- Excellent power efficiency for its era
- Good for basic daily computing
- Integrated HD 6000 handles 4K video well
- Low heat output
Cons
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
- Soldered to motherboard (BGA)
- Uses obsolete DDR3 memory
- Weak integrated graphics for 3D work
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-5500U
- AMD A8-7100Rival
Mobile APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-5200URival
Mobile Thin & Light
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4500URival
Mobile Thin & Light
- Intel Core i7-6500UAlt
Skylake successor with DDR4 support.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200UAlt
Newer dual-core with better graphics and modern platform.
Modern 10nm alternative with vastly superior performance.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Incredible leap in efficiency and speed over Broadwell-U.
Compare head-to-head - Intel Core i5-8250UAlt
8th gen quad-core alternative that outperforms it heavily.
Intel Core i5-5350U
- Intel Core i7-5650URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-5200URival
Mobile
- AMD A10-8700PRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-5500URival
Mobile
- AMD A8-7410Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-8250UAlt
Offers 4 cores and much better modern performance.
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAlt
Superior Vega graphics and quad-core design.
- Intel Core i3-7100UAlt
Newer architecture with similar basic performance.
- Intel Core i5-6200UAlt
The direct Skylake successor with DDR4 support.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200UAlt
Better budget mobile performance.
Our Verdict on Each
A highly efficient dual-core processor for 2015 ultrabooks that provided excellent battery life, though it struggles significantly with modern multitasking.
Best for: Buying a very cheap used laptop for basic web browsing or typing.
Read the full reviewA historically significant processor for battery life, but its dual-core architecture is too weak for modern demanding workloads.
Best for: Today, the Core i5-5350U is strictly an end-of-life component and should not be considered for new builds. If you are purchasing a used laptop featuring this processor, it should only be for basic tasks such as web browsing, word processing, and media consumption. It can be found at very low prices on the secondary market, making it a viable option for students or budget-conscious users needing a simple machine. However, its dual-core architecture struggles significantly with modern multitasking and heavy workloads. Ensure the device is priced appropriately for its age, as it lacks support for modern standards like DDR4 memory and PCIe 3.0. Avoid this chip if you intend to do any gaming, video editing, or intensive productivity work.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i7-5500U or Intel Core i5-5350U?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-5350U comes out ahead with a score of 6.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Do Core i7-5500U and Intel Core i5-5350U use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1168 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-5350U posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-5350U (2,950). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.