CPU Comparison
Core i7-4850EQ vs Core i7-920XM
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4850EQ is a mobile processor launched in 2013, designed for embedded systems and high-performance mobile workstations. Built on the 22-nanometer Haswell architecture, it was part of the Crystalwell family, notable for integrating a massive 128 MB L4 eDRAM cache. The processor features four cores and eight threads, operating at a base frequency of 1.6 GHz and boosting up to 3.2 GHz. This low base clock and high turbo capability allowed it to scale efficiently based on thermal loads. It includes 8 MB of L3 cache and integrates Intel HD Graphics 5200, also known as Iris Pro, which utilizes the eDRAM for massive bandwidth gains. With a 47-watt thermal design power, it was engineered for devices requiring desktop-class graphics and compute power in constrained mobile or embedded form factors. Though end-of-life, it remains a historically significant chip for its innovative packaging indeed.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid quad-core performance for professional workloads.
Adequate for basic tasks but severely outpaced by modern mobile CPUs.
Gaming
Iris Pro 5200 allowed for 1080p medium gaming in 2013.
Capable of playing older 2010-era titles well, but struggles with modern games.
Virtualization
Good VM performance with VT-d and quad cores.
Good for running basic VMs on the go, though limited by modern standards.
Efficiency
22nm process and 47W TDP result in high heat by modern standards.
Very poor efficiency by modern standards, with high idle and load power draw.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- eDRAM does not benefit modern AI significantly
- No AI acceleration hardware
- Unsuitable for modern AI workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs of its era
- eDRAM provides stable frame rates
- Good for 720p/1080p medium gaming
- High clock speeds for its era
- Lacks modern instruction sets like AVX
- Requires discrete GPU
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Iris Pro 5200 with 128MB eDRAM
- Quad-core performance for 2013
- Good for embedded applications
- Large 8MB L3 cache
Cons
- High 47W TDP
- 22nm process is inefficient
- DDR3 memory only
- Soldered to motherboard
- Obsolete for modern tasks
Pros
- Unlocked multiplier
- Quad-core performance for mobile
- 8MB L3 cache
- Turbo Boost technology
Cons
- Very high power consumption (120W max)
- No integrated graphics
- Obsolete socket
- Runs very hot
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-4850EQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile APU
- Intel Core i7-4700MQRival
Mobile Performance
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4900MQRival
Mobile Workstation
- Intel Core i7-5700HQAlt
Broadwell successor with better efficiency and 14nm process.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700UAlt
Modern 8-core alternative with vastly superior graphics.
- Alt
Massive leap in mobile CPU and GPU efficiency.
Compare head-to-head Modern 10nm alternative with better graphics and efficiency.
Compare head-to-head6-core alternative that offers much more performance.
Compare head-to-head
Core i7-920XM
- AMD Phenom II X4 MobileRival
Mobile High-End
- Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300Rival
Mobile Extreme
- Intel Core i7-820QMRival
Mobile High-End
- Intel Core i7-720QMRival
Mobile Mid-Range
- AMD Turion II UltraRival
Mobile Mainstream
- Intel Core i7-940XMAlt
Slightly faster refresh of the same architecture.
- AMD Phenom II X4 N950Alt
AMD's alternative mobile quad-core.
Better efficiency for basic mobile tasks.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
An innovative 4th Gen processor that brought console-like eDRAM architecture to mobile PCs, offering excellent integrated graphics for its time.
Best for: Industrial retrofitting or restoring a legacy MacBook Pro.
Read the full reviewA groundbreaking mobile CPU that brought unlocked quad-core performance to laptops, though it runs hot and is obsolete today.
Best for: Retro gaming laptop restoration.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which uses less power?
The Core i7-4850EQ has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i7-4850EQ (47 W), Core i7-920XM (55 W).
Do Core i7-4850EQ and Core i7-920XM use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Core i7-4850EQ: Intel BGA 1364, Core i7-920XM: Intel Socket G1), so each needs a compatible motherboard.