CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4760HQ vs Core i7-920XM
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4760HQ is a premium mobile processor released in February 2014, bridging the gap between standard Haswell parts and the top-tier Crystalwell variants. Designed for high-end laptops and portable workstations, it features four cores and eight threads to handle demanding workloads. Operating at a base frequency of 2.1 GHz with turbo speeds up to 3.3 GHz, it offers a slight uptick in CPU performance over the 4750HQ. Crucially, it integrates Intel HD Graphics 5200, backed by 128MB of L4 eDRAM, delivering exceptional graphical performance for an integrated solution. This made it ideal for thin-and-light systems requiring capable 1080p gaming and media encoding without the added heat of a discrete GPU. With a 47-watt TDP, it required robust cooling. Though end-of-life, the 4760HQ was a versatile chip that offered a balanced blend of computational speed and best-in-class integrated graphics for its era.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Better CPU clocks than 4750HQ improve responsiveness.
Adequate for basic tasks but severely outpaced by modern mobile CPUs.
Gaming
Excellent integrated graphics for 2014 titles.
Capable of playing older 2010-era titles well, but struggles with modern games.
Virtualization
Capable of running standard VMs.
Good for running basic VMs on the go, though limited by modern standards.
Efficiency
47W TDP is standard for its class.
Very poor efficiency by modern standards, with high idle and load power draw.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No AI acceleration hardware
- Unsuitable for modern AI workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Iris Pro handles older games well
- Comparable to GT 740M
- High clock speeds for its era
- Lacks modern instruction sets like AVX
- Requires discrete GPU
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Iris Pro 5200 graphics
- 128MB L4 eDRAM
- Good 3.3GHz turbo boost
- Solid quad-core performance
Cons
- Soldered BGA package
- 47W TDP runs warm
- Outdated 22nm process
- Low availability
Pros
- Unlocked multiplier
- Quad-core performance for mobile
- 8MB L3 cache
- Turbo Boost technology
Cons
- Very high power consumption (120W max)
- No integrated graphics
- Obsolete socket
- Runs very hot
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4760HQ
- AMD A10-7300MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4750HQRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4770HQRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700UAlt
Modern alternative with vastly better efficiency.
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Modern premium laptop alternative.
- Alt
Massive leap in integrated graphics and efficiency.
Compare head-to-head
Core i7-920XM
- AMD Phenom II X4 MobileRival
Mobile High-End
- Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300Rival
Mobile Extreme
- Intel Core i7-820QMRival
Mobile High-End
- Intel Core i7-720QMRival
Mobile Mid-Range
- AMD Turion II UltraRival
Mobile Mainstream
- Intel Core i7-940XMAlt
Slightly faster refresh of the same architecture.
- AMD Phenom II X4 N950Alt
AMD's alternative mobile quad-core.
Better efficiency for basic mobile tasks.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A well-balanced mobile processor offering a slight clock bump over the 4750HQ while retaining excellent Iris Pro graphics.
Best for: An Intel Core i7-4760HQ is a rare find today, typically only encountered when repairing older premium ultrabooks or all-in-one systems. If you are considering a purchase, the primary value lies in its Iris Pro graphics. For retro gaming or running older creative suites, the HD 5200 combined with the quad-core CPU still provides a surprisingly capable experience. However, the 47-watt TDP means battery life in older laptops will be poor, and thermals can be an issue if the machine hasn't been cleaned and repasted. If you are sourcing this chip for a board-level repair, ensure you have the correct BGA reballing equipment, as it is permanently soldered. For everyday use, modern budget laptops will outperform this chip in efficiency and single-core tasks. Only invest in a system with this CPU if it is exceptionally cheap, serving as a secondary device for light media creation or nostalgic gaming sessions.
Read the full reviewA groundbreaking mobile CPU that brought unlocked quad-core performance to laptops, though it runs hot and is obsolete today.
Best for: Retro gaming laptop restoration.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4760HQ or Core i7-920XM?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4760HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 72/100 among Intel Core i7-4760HQ and Core i7-920XM.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-4760HQ has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-4760HQ (47 W), Core i7-920XM (55 W).
Do Intel Core i7-4760HQ and Core i7-920XM use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-4760HQ: Intel BGA 1364, Core i7-920XM: Intel Socket G1), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4760HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4760HQ (8,100). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.