CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4760HQ vs Core i7-5700HQ
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4760HQ is a premium mobile processor released in February 2014, bridging the gap between standard Haswell parts and the top-tier Crystalwell variants. Designed for high-end laptops and portable workstations, it features four cores and eight threads to handle demanding workloads. Operating at a base frequency of 2.1 GHz with turbo speeds up to 3.3 GHz, it offers a slight uptick in CPU performance over the 4750HQ. Crucially, it integrates Intel HD Graphics 5200, backed by 128MB of L4 eDRAM, delivering exceptional graphical performance for an integrated solution. This made it ideal for thin-and-light systems requiring capable 1080p gaming and media encoding without the added heat of a discrete GPU. With a 47-watt TDP, it required robust cooling. Though end-of-life, the 4760HQ was a versatile chip that offered a balanced blend of computational speed and best-in-class integrated graphics for its era.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Better CPU clocks than 4750HQ improve responsiveness.
Adequate for basic tasks but slow for modern multi-threaded workloads.
Gaming
Excellent integrated graphics for 2014 titles.
Handles older eSports titles well but struggles with modern AAA games.
Virtualization
Capable of running standard VMs.
Can run basic VMs but limited by DDR3 memory bandwidth.
Efficiency
47W TDP is standard for its class.
47W TDP results in poor battery life compared to modern mobile chips.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No dedicated AI hardware
- No AVX-512 support
- Unsuitable for modern AI workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Iris Pro handles older games well
- Comparable to GT 740M
- Suitable for older games
- Requires discrete GPU for 3D workloads
- Bottlenecks modern graphics cards
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Iris Pro 5200 graphics
- 128MB L4 eDRAM
- Good 3.3GHz turbo boost
- Solid quad-core performance
Cons
- Soldered BGA package
- 47W TDP runs warm
- Outdated 22nm process
- Low availability
Pros
- Solid quad-core performance for 2015
- Good turbo boost frequencies
- Supports AVX2 instructions
- Reliable for legacy gaming
Cons
- End-of-life platform
- Uses outdated DDR3 memory
- High power consumption by modern standards
- Integrated graphics are very weak
- BGA socket prevents upgrades
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4760HQ
- AMD A10-7300MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4750HQRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4770HQRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700UAlt
Modern alternative with vastly better efficiency.
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Modern premium laptop alternative.
- Alt
Massive leap in integrated graphics and efficiency.
Compare head-to-head
Core i7-5700HQ
- AMD FX-8800PRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i7-4720HQRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i5-4210HRival
Mobile Performance
- Intel Core i7-6700HQAlt
Newer Skylake architecture with DDR4 support.
- Intel Core i7-7700HQAlt
Better performance and efficiency.
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAlt
Modern alternative with much better integrated graphics and battery life.
- Intel Core i5-8250UAlt
8th gen U-series outperforms it in multi-core while using less power.
- Alt
Revolutionary efficiency and performance leap over Broadwell mobile chips.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A well-balanced mobile processor offering a slight clock bump over the 4750HQ while retaining excellent Iris Pro graphics.
Best for: An Intel Core i7-4760HQ is a rare find today, typically only encountered when repairing older premium ultrabooks or all-in-one systems. If you are considering a purchase, the primary value lies in its Iris Pro graphics. For retro gaming or running older creative suites, the HD 5200 combined with the quad-core CPU still provides a surprisingly capable experience. However, the 47-watt TDP means battery life in older laptops will be poor, and thermals can be an issue if the machine hasn't been cleaned and repasted. If you are sourcing this chip for a board-level repair, ensure you have the correct BGA reballing equipment, as it is permanently soldered. For everyday use, modern budget laptops will outperform this chip in efficiency and single-core tasks. Only invest in a system with this CPU if it is exceptionally cheap, serving as a secondary device for light media creation or nostalgic gaming sessions.
Read the full reviewA reliable workhorse of the mid-2010s that provided excellent quad-core performance for gaming laptops, though it is heavily outdated by modern efficiency and speed standards.
Best for: Purchasing a heavily discounted used laptop for retro gaming or basic typing.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4760HQ or Core i7-5700HQ?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4760HQ comes out ahead with a score of 7.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4760HQ or Core i7-5700HQ?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4760HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 72/100 among Intel Core i7-4760HQ and Core i7-5700HQ.
Do Intel Core i7-4760HQ and Core i7-5700HQ use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4760HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4760HQ (8,100). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.