CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4750HQ vs Intel Core i7-4940MX
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4750HQ is a high-end mobile processor launched in May 2013, notable for being one of the first to feature Intel's Crystalwell architecture with integrated eDRAM. Designed for premium laptops and mobile workstations, it boasts four cores and eight threads, handling intensive multitasking with ease. Operating at a base clock of 2.0 GHz and boosting up to 3.2 GHz, it prioritizes graphical prowess over raw CPU clock speed. The integration of Intel HD Graphics 5200, backed by 128MB of L4 eDRAM, revolutionized mobile integrated graphics, allowing thin laptops to game at 1080p without a discrete GPU. With a 47-watt TDP, it required substantial cooling but delivered unprecedented performance for its size. Although end-of-life, the 4750HQ remains a landmark chip, demonstrating Intel's commitment to pushing the boundaries of integrated graphics performance and setting the stage for future Iris Xe designs.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Strong quad-core performance, slightly limited by 2.0GHz base.
8 threads and 4.0 GHz boost make quick work of compiling and rendering.
Gaming
Excellent integrated graphics for older 1080p titles.
Excellent for older games and can handle modern eSports easily with a discrete GPU.
Virtualization
Capable of running standard VMs.
Good for running VMs, though limited by mobile platform constraints.
Efficiency
47W TDP is standard but outdated.
57W TDP is very power-hungry for a mobile chip, resulting in poor battery life.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No AI hardware
- CPU inference is slow
Content Creation
Gaming
- Iris Pro 5200 rivals entry-level discrete GPUs
- Great for 2013 games
- Won't bottleneck 2014-era GPUs
- Can be overclocked for extra FPS
- Requires massive laptop cooling
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Iris Pro 5200 graphics
- 128MB L4 eDRAM
- Quad-core multitasking
- Good turbo boost headroom
Cons
- Low 2.0GHz base clock
- 47W TDP runs warm
- Soldered BGA package
- Outdated 22nm process
Pros
- 4.0 GHz turbo boost
- Unlocked multiplier
- Full 8MB L3 cache
- Removable PGA socket
Cons
- Extremely high 57W TDP
- Runs very hot
- Expensive launch price
- Poor battery life
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-3635QMRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4760HQRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700UAlt
Modern alternative with excellent integrated graphics.
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Massive leap in mobile efficiency and iGPU.
- Alt
Modern premium laptop alternative.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i7-4940MX
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4900MQRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4930MXRival
Mobile Extreme
- Intel Core i7-3940XMRival
Mobile Extreme
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-5950HQAlt
Newer Broadwell architecture with better efficiency.
- AMD Ryzen 7 3750HAlt
Modern mobile alternative with better efficiency.
6-core modern alternative that destroys it in performance.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Incredible modern performance per watt.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A groundbreaking mobile processor that brought console-class integrated graphics to thin laptops.
Best for: Finding a device with an Intel Core i7-4750HQ today is rare, as it was an expensive, premium part upon release. If you locate a used laptop with this chip, it is likely an older MacBook Pro or a high-end ultrabook. The integrated HD 5200 graphics still hold up surprisingly well for older games and media consumption, making it a decent option for a portable retro gaming machine. However, the 2.0 GHz base clock means CPU-heavy tasks will feel sluggish compared to modern processors. If you are repairing a vintage premium laptop, this CPU is essential for restoring functionality. Do not pay a premium price for a system with this processor today. Its value lies strictly in nostalgia or maintaining a legacy creative workstation. For modern efficiency and performance, even a low-end current-generation Celeron will outclass it in battery life and single-core speed. Approach it as a collector’s item or budget retro rig.
Read the full reviewA legendary mobile CPU that hit 4.0 GHz and offered unlocked overclocking, providing desktop-level performance for laptops.
Best for: Collecting vintage gaming laptops or extreme budget used systems.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4750HQ or Intel Core i7-4940MX?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4940MX comes out ahead with a score of 8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4750HQ or Intel Core i7-4940MX?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4750HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 70/100 among Intel Core i7-4750HQ and Intel Core i7-4940MX.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-4750HQ has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-4750HQ (47 W), Intel Core i7-4940MX (57 W).
Do Intel Core i7-4750HQ and Intel Core i7-4940MX use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-4750HQ: Intel BGA 1364, Intel Core i7-4940MX: Intel Socket G3), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4750HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4750HQ (8,000), Intel Core i7-4940MX (6,200). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.