CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-4702HQ vs Intel Core i7-4950HQ
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-4702HQ is a fourth-generation mobile processor introduced in May 2013, optimized for thin-and-light performance laptops requiring a lower thermal footprint. As a variant of the Haswell family, it delivers four cores and eight threads, ensuring robust multitasking capabilities despite its constrained power envelope. Operating at a base clock of 2.2 GHz with a maximum turbo frequency of 3.2 GHz, it intentionally steps down from the 4700HQ to accommodate slimmer chassis designs. It features Intel HD Graphics 4600, which handles everyday multimedia tasks efficiently, though it lacks the advanced Crystalwell eDRAM found in higher-tier models. With a reduced TDP of 37 watts, it became a favorite for premium ultrabooks and portable workstations where battery life and thermals were prioritized. Though now end-of-life, it provided an excellent balance of performance and portability for users needing workstation-class multitasking in a highly mobile form factor.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Handles everyday office multitasking well.
Handles everyday tasks well, but slow by modern standards.
Gaming
Only suitable for very old or lightweight games.
Competent for 2013 games, but struggles with modern titles.
Virtualization
Capable of basic VMs but limited by clock speed.
Adequate for basic VM usage.
Efficiency
Better than 47W parts, but still outdated.
High TDP and 22nm process result in poor battery life.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI acceleration
- Lacks modern AI acceleration
- Slow compute times
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 4600 is not for gaming
- Pairs poorly with modern GPUs
- Iris Pro eDRAM helps textures
- Unlocked multiplier allows slight performance tuning
- Not for modern AAA gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Lower 37W TDP for slim laptops
- Quad-core multitasking
- Good battery life for its era
- Supports VT-d and AES-NI
Cons
- Lower clock speeds
- Soldered BGA package
- No eDRAM
- Outdated 22nm process
Pros
- Unlocked multiplier (rare for mobile)
- Iris Pro 5200 with eDRAM
- Solid multi-threaded performance for its era
Cons
- Very poor efficiency by modern standards
- End-of-life
- Soldered to motherboard
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- AMD A10-5745MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4500URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4200URival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3612QMRival
Mobile
Slightly faster low-TDP alternative.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
Modern alternative with massive efficiency gains.
- Intel Core i5-8250UAlt
Modern quad-core alternative with much better battery life.
If higher TDP and cooling is available.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Vastly superior thin-and-light performance.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i7-4950HQ
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4700HQRival
Mobile
- AMD FX-7600PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-3632QMRival
Mobile
- Apple A7Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700UAlt
Massive leap in efficiency and multi-core performance.
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Modern single-core speeds and superior integrated graphics.
- Alt
Industry-leading performance per watt.
Compare head-to-head Better battery life and modern feature set.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
Affordable modern alternative with 6 cores.
Our Verdict on Each
A lower-power Haswell variant that brought quad-core capabilities to thinner laptops, though easily outclassed by modern chips.
Best for: If you encounter a laptop with an Intel Core i7-4702HQ today, it should be viewed strictly as a budget-friendly secondary device. The processor is end-of-life, meaning it will not receive modern optimization updates, and its 22nm process is inherently less efficient than current offerings. For basic tasks like web browsing, document editing, and media consumption, this CPU still has enough life left to provide a smooth experience. However, its lower clock speeds mean it will struggle with modern multitasking or heavy workloads. If you are repairing a legacy system, this chip is a drop-in replacement for BGA 1364 motherboards, but you must ensure your cooling solution is pristine, as even 37 watts can throttle aggressively in a degraded laptop chassis. Avoid paying premium prices for this outdated hardware; only pursue it if the price reflects its retro capability and limited futureproofing.
Read the full reviewAn important step forward for mobile integrated graphics, offering unique overclocking potential, but now obsolete.
Best for: Purchasing a used laptop at a rock-bottom price. Buying advice for the Core i7-4950HQ today suggests avoiding significant investment. While it was a formidable processor in its prime, modern applications and operating systems demand greater efficiency and newer instruction sets. If you encounter a used laptop featuring this chip at a very low price, it can still serve adequately for web browsing, office tasks, and media playback. However, its 47-watt TDP and older 22nm process mean it will run warmer and consume more power than modern equivalents. For gaming or content creation, its integrated graphics, while historically significant, no longer meet modern baseline requirements. Save your budget for a newer system that offers better longevity.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-4702HQ or Intel Core i7-4950HQ?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-4950HQ comes out ahead with a score of 6.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-4702HQ or Intel Core i7-4950HQ?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4702HQ leads with a gaming performance score of 50/100 among Intel Core i7-4702HQ and Intel Core i7-4950HQ.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-4702HQ has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-4702HQ (37 W), Intel Core i7-4950HQ (47 W).
Do Intel Core i7-4702HQ and Intel Core i7-4950HQ use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1364 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-4950HQ posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-4702HQ (7,000), Intel Core i7-4950HQ (8,400). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.