CPU Comparison
Core i7-3610QE vs Intel Core i3-8145UE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-3610QE is an embedded mobile processor launched in April 2012 as part of the Ivy Bridge lineup. Designed specifically for the embedded sector, this 22nm quad-core CPU features Hyper-Threading, allowing it to process 8 threads concurrently. Operating at a base frequency of 2.3 GHz and boosting up to 3.3 GHz, it delivers robust multi-threaded performance for industrial applications. The 'QE' suffix denotes an embedded quad-core BGA package, meaning it is soldered directly to the motherboard for mechanical stability in high-vibration environments. With a 45W TDP, it requires robust cooling but provides workstation-class computational power. The processor includes 6MB of L3 cache and integrates Intel HD Graphics 4000, offering competent multimedia capabilities for digital signage and medical imaging. The i7-3610QE is tailored for long-life cycle products like ruggedized servers, factory automation controllers, and portable medical devices where reliability and sustained performance are paramount.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
No data
- No dedicated AI hardware.
- CPU inference is extremely slow on 2 cores.
- Not suitable for any AI workloads.
Content Creation
No data
Gaming
No data
- This is an embedded processor not designed for gaming.
- UHD 620 cannot handle modern 3D workloads.
- Form factors using this chip lack discrete GPU support.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Guaranteed long-term embedded availability
- Solid quad-core multi-threading
- 6MB L3 cache
- PCIe 3.0 support for industrial expansion
Cons
- 45W TDP requires active cooling
- Soldered BGA package limits upgrades
- Uses obsolete DDR3 memory
- Hard to source for consumers
Pros
- 12.5W cTDP down enables true fanless designs
- Long-lifecycle embedded support
- Hardware security mitigations included
- 10nm power efficiency
- Dual-channel memory support
Cons
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
- Expensive for the compute performance offered
- Lacks LPDDR4/DDR5 support
- Outdated UHD Graphics 620
- No PCIe 4.0 support
Competitors & Alternatives
Core i7-3610QE
- AMD Embedded R-3665GRival
Embedded Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-2710QERival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Core i7-3610QMRival
High-Performance Mobile
- AMD Embedded A10-5750MRival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2Rival
Embedded Server
- Intel Core i7-4700EQAlt
Haswell successor with better efficiency and AVX2.
- Intel Core i7-3612QMAlt
Lower 35W TDP version if thermal headroom is tight.
- Intel Core i5-3610QEAlt
More budget-friendly embedded dual-core option.
Intel Core i3-8145UE
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200URival
Budget Mobile
- Intel Celeron J4125Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- Intel Pentium Silver J5005Rival
Low-Power Embedded
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GERival
Embedded Desktop
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 850Rival
Always-Connected
The non-embedded variant if long-lifecycle guarantees are not strictly required.
Compare head-to-head- Intel N100 (Alder Lake-N)Alt
A vastly superior modern alternative for new embedded designs featuring 4 efficient cores.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3580UAlt
Provides significantly more multi-threaded performance if the embedded chassis can handle the thermals.
- ARM Cortex-A78 Based SoCsAlt
Better efficiency for pure edge IoT tasks that do not strictly require x86.
Our Verdict on Each
A dependable embedded quad-core CPU that brought solid multi-threaded performance to long-life industrial systems.
Best for: Sourcing replacements for legacy industrial boards
Read the full reviewA niche embedded chip that brings hardware-level security mitigations and 10nm efficiency to industrial form factors, though its 2-core architecture is fundamentally outdated for anything beyond basic embedded tasks.
Best for: Only for OEMs maintaining existing 8th gen embedded product lines or replacing failed units in active industrial installations.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Core i7-3610QE or Intel Core i3-8145UE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-3610QE comes out ahead with a score of 7/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i3-8145UE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Core i7-3610QE (45 W), Intel Core i3-8145UE (15 W).
Do Core i7-3610QE and Intel Core i3-8145UE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Core i7-3610QE: Socket G2 (988B), Intel Core i3-8145UE: BGA 1528), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Core i7-3610QE has the most cores. Core counts: Core i7-3610QE (4 cores), Intel Core i3-8145UE (2 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-3610QE posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Core i7-3610QE (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.