CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-3555LE vs Intel Core i7-4558U
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-3555LE is a specialized low-power mobile processor launched in June 2012 as part of the Ivy Bridge family. The 'LE' suffix denotes its focus on embedded and semi-ruggedized systems, operating at a 25-watt TDP. Built on Intel's 22nm process, it features 2 cores and 4 threads. The processor runs at a base clock of 2.5 GHz and can boost up to 3.2 GHz. It includes 4MB of L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR3 memory. A standout feature of the 3555LE is its support for ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, making it suitable for small-scale servers, industrial PCs, and critical embedded systems where data integrity is paramount. While its dual-core design limits multi-threaded performance, its combination of low power consumption, ECC support, and high base clock makes it a versatile chip for specialized industrial applications.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Slow for modern office tasks but okay for basic embedded UI.
High clock speeds ensure good performance in office apps.
Gaming
Not intended for gaming.
Iris 5100 allows for playable frame rates in older or well-optimized games.
Virtualization
Capable of running one light VM, but limited by 2 cores.
Capable of running one light VM, but limited by 2 cores.
Efficiency
25W TDP was efficient in 2012, but outdated now.
28W TDP is warmer than 15W parts but justified by performance.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No dedicated AI hardware
Content Creation
Gaming
- Not intended for gaming
- HD 4000 is too weak for modern titles
- Iris 5100 is a major step up from HD 4400
- Can run older games at low settings
- Not suitable for modern AAA titles
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- ECC memory support
- 25W TDP for compact designs
- VT-x and VT-d virtualization
- HD 4000 graphics
Cons
- Only 2 cores
- Very slow for modern tasks
- No Windows 11 support
- Soldered to motherboard
Pros
- High 3.3 GHz boost clock
- Iris 5100 graphics with eDRAM
- 28W TDP allows good sustained performance
- Excellent single-core speed
Cons
- Runs warmer than 15W U-series chips
- Soldered to motherboard
- 22nm process is outdated
- Only 2 cores
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-3555LE
- AMD Embedded G-T40NRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-2655LERival
Embedded
- Intel Core i5-3550LERival
Embedded
- AMD Embedded R-464LRival
Embedded
- Intel Atom E3827Rival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-4600LEAlt
Successor with better performance and efficiency.
Modern embedded alternative with 6 cores.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BAlt
Modern embedded alternative with Vega graphics.
Quad-core alternative with ECC support.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Atom C3758Alt
Modern low-power embedded alternative.
Intel Core i7-4558U
- AMD A10-5745MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4500URival
Mobile
- AMD A8-5557MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4258URival
Mobile
- AMD A10-5757MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-5557UAlt
5th Gen successor with Iris 6100 graphics.
- Alt
Vastly superior performance and efficiency for Mac users.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 4800UAlt
Much better multi-core performance in a similar power bracket.
Modern alternative with massive IPC and graphics improvements.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5500UAlt
Modern budget alternative with 6 cores.
Our Verdict on Each
A reliable 2012 embedded chip with ECC support, but too slow for modern consumer workloads.
Best for: If you are considering the Intel Core i7-3555LE, you are likely maintaining an older industrial PC or a specialized embedded system. This processor should not be sought for consumer use, as its dual-core design is severely outdated for modern multitasking and productivity workloads. It is only recommended if you need to keep a specific legacy system running that requires a direct replacement part with ECC memory support. Avoid using this CPU for general web browsing or modern office work, as its performance is too low and inefficient. It is best utilized in its original context: low-power, always-on embedded systems where stability is paramount. For any new industrial builds, modern embedded processors offer vastly superior performance, security, and power efficiency.
Read the full reviewA premium 28W mobile CPU that combined high clock speeds with Iris graphics, delivering an excellent balance of CPU and GPU performance for 2013.
Best for: If you are considering a laptop with the Intel Core i7-4558U, you are likely looking at a used MacBook Pro or a premium ultrabook. This processor remains capable for everyday productivity, programming, and light 1080p video editing. The inclusion of Iris 5100 graphics provides a noticeable boost in graphical tasks compared to standard U-series chips. It is an excellent choice for users who need a compact, moderately powerful machine without paying the premium for modern hardware. However, be aware that it is an older Intel-based Mac, meaning it will eventually lose macOS support. Avoid this processor if you need to run modern AAA games or heavy 3D rendering workloads. It is best purchased at a discount for general use.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-3555LE or Intel Core i7-4558U?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4558U leads with a gaming performance score of 25/100 among Intel Core i7-3555LE and Intel Core i7-4558U.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-3555LE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-3555LE (25 W), Intel Core i7-4558U (28 W).
Do Intel Core i7-3555LE and Intel Core i7-4558U use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-3555LE: Intel BGA 1023, Intel Core i7-4558U: Intel BGA 1168), so each needs a compatible motherboard.