CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-3517U vs Intel Core i3-10110U
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-3517U is an ultra-low voltage mobile processor launched in June 2012 as part of the Ivy Bridge family. Designed primarily for the burgeoning Ultrabook market, it operates at a 17-watt TDP, striking a balance between performance and battery life. Built on Intel's 22nm process, it features 2 cores and 4 threads. The processor runs at a base clock of 1.9 GHz and can dynamically boost up to 3.0 GHz using Intel Turbo Boost Technology. It includes 4MB of L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR3 memory. The integration of Intel HD Graphics 4000 provided a noticeable improvement in graphical capabilities over the previous generation's HD 3000, allowing for basic 1080p gaming and smooth hardware-accelerated video decoding. While its dual-core architecture limits its multi-threaded potential by modern standards, the 3517U was a highly capable chip in its era, powering countless thin-and-light laptops and ultrabooks.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Slow for modern office tasks and multitasking.
Can handle a single Word document or spreadsheet, but opening multiple browser tabs alongside office apps will cause severe slowdowns.
Gaming
Cannot run modern games; struggles with basic 3D.
The basic UHD graphics cannot handle any modern games. Even older e-sports titles will struggle at low settings.
Virtualization
Not recommended due to 2 cores.
2 cores and 4 threads are fundamentally inadequate for running virtual machines.
Efficiency
17W TDP was efficient in 2012, but outdated now.
While 25W is low, modern ARM chips and newer Intel chips do far more work per watt.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No AI hardware
- No AVX-512
- Cannot handle AI tasks
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 4000 is too weak
- Only suitable for older 2D games
- No dedicated gaming capability
- Integrated UHD graphics are severely limited
- CPU bottlenecks even the lightest games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Was efficient in 2012
- Good single-core burst performance
- 17W TDP
- Enabled thin-and-light designs
Cons
- Only 2 cores
- Very slow for modern tasks
- No Windows 11 support
- 22nm process is outdated
Pros
- Very cheap on the used market
- Low 25W power draw
- Supports both DDR3L and DDR4
- 4.1 GHz boost provides okay single-task speed
- Sufficient for basic offline typing
Cons
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads
- 4MB L3 cache is very small
- End-of-Life and no longer manufactured
- UHD graphics are extremely weak
- Struggles with modern web applications
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-3517U
- AMD A6-4455MRival
Mobile
- AMD A10-4655MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-3317URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2677MRival
Mobile
- AMD A8-4555MRival
Mobile
Successor with better efficiency and performance.
Compare head-to-headModern budget CPU with vastly superior performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 5300UAlt
Modern budget alternative.
Excellent modern ultrabook chip.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Unmatched efficiency for basic use.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i3-10110U
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200URival
Budget Mobile
- AMD Athlon 300URival
Budget Mobile
- Intel Pentium Gold 5405URival
Entry Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7cRival
Budget Mobile
- MediaTek Kompanio 500Rival
Budget Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300UAlt
Offers 4 cores and 8 threads, completely solving the multitasking issues of the 10110U.
11th-gen successor with much better single-core performance and Iris Xe graphics.
Compare head-to-headA massive leap in performance and efficiency for thin-and-light laptops.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
If buying a premium laptop, the M1 offers exponentially better battery life and performance.
Compare head-to-head - Any Modern ARM ChromebookAlt
For basic web browsing, a cheap ARM Chromebook will feel faster and last longer on a charge.
Our Verdict on Each
A capable 2012 ultrabook chip, but its dual-core design is too slow for modern multitasking.
Best for: If you are considering a laptop with the Intel Core i7-3517U today, it should only be purchased in the used market at an extremely low price. It remains capable of very basic web browsing and document editing, but its 2-core design is a major bottleneck for modern multitasking. Avoid purchasing a laptop with this CPU if you need to do any modern productivity work, video editing, or gaming. It is best suited for budget-conscious buyers who need a cheap, secondary machine for light web browsing or for students on a very tight budget. For any primary computing needs, investing in a newer platform is strongly recommended for better efficiency, security, and performance.
Read the full reviewObsolete for modern use. Its 2 cores struggle heavily with today's web applications, making it suitable only for the lightest, most basic computing tasks.
Best for: You should avoid purchasing any new laptop containing the Intel Core i3-10110U in today's market. With only 2 cores and 4 threads, this processor struggles heavily with modern web browsing habits, where having dozens of tabs open alongside streaming video or communication apps will quickly saturate its processing capability. If you are looking at the used or refurbished market, laptops with this chip should only be considered if they are exceptionally cheap (under $150) and if your usage is strictly limited to lightweight tasks like writing documents, watching offline video, or basic web surfing. For a new budget laptop, even the most basic ARM-based Chromebook or an AMD Ryzen 3 powered Windows laptop will provide a vastly superior, longer-lasting experience due to having more CPU cores and significantly better integrated graphics. Do not buy this chip for any form of multitasking.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-3517U or Intel Core i3-10110U?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-3517U comes out ahead with a score of 4/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-3517U or Intel Core i3-10110U?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-3517U leads with a gaming performance score of 10/100 among Intel Core i7-3517U and Intel Core i3-10110U.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-3517U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-3517U (17 W), Intel Core i3-10110U (25 W).
Do Intel Core i7-3517U and Intel Core i3-10110U use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-3517U: Intel BGA 1023, Intel Core i3-10110U: BGA 1440), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i3-10110U posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i3-10110U (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.