CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-3517U vs Intel Core i7-3555LE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i7-3517U is an ultra-low voltage mobile processor launched in June 2012 as part of the Ivy Bridge family. Designed primarily for the burgeoning Ultrabook market, it operates at a 17-watt TDP, striking a balance between performance and battery life. Built on Intel's 22nm process, it features 2 cores and 4 threads. The processor runs at a base clock of 1.9 GHz and can dynamically boost up to 3.0 GHz using Intel Turbo Boost Technology. It includes 4MB of L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR3 memory. The integration of Intel HD Graphics 4000 provided a noticeable improvement in graphical capabilities over the previous generation's HD 3000, allowing for basic 1080p gaming and smooth hardware-accelerated video decoding. While its dual-core architecture limits its multi-threaded potential by modern standards, the 3517U was a highly capable chip in its era, powering countless thin-and-light laptops and ultrabooks.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Slow for modern office tasks and multitasking.
Slow for modern office tasks but okay for basic embedded UI.
Gaming
Cannot run modern games; struggles with basic 3D.
Not intended for gaming.
Virtualization
Not recommended due to 2 cores.
Capable of running one light VM, but limited by 2 cores.
Efficiency
17W TDP was efficient in 2012, but outdated now.
25W TDP was efficient in 2012, but outdated now.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI hardware
- No AI hardware
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 4000 is too weak
- Only suitable for older 2D games
- Not intended for gaming
- HD 4000 is too weak for modern titles
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Was efficient in 2012
- Good single-core burst performance
- 17W TDP
- Enabled thin-and-light designs
Cons
- Only 2 cores
- Very slow for modern tasks
- No Windows 11 support
- 22nm process is outdated
Pros
- ECC memory support
- 25W TDP for compact designs
- VT-x and VT-d virtualization
- HD 4000 graphics
Cons
- Only 2 cores
- Very slow for modern tasks
- No Windows 11 support
- Soldered to motherboard
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-3517U
- AMD A6-4455MRival
Mobile
- AMD A10-4655MRival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-3317URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-2677MRival
Mobile
- AMD A8-4555MRival
Mobile
Successor with better efficiency and performance.
Compare head-to-headModern budget CPU with vastly superior performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 5300UAlt
Modern budget alternative.
Excellent modern ultrabook chip.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Unmatched efficiency for basic use.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i7-3555LE
- AMD Embedded G-T40NRival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-2655LERival
Embedded
- Intel Core i5-3550LERival
Embedded
- AMD Embedded R-464LRival
Embedded
- Intel Atom E3827Rival
Embedded
- Intel Core i7-4600LEAlt
Successor with better performance and efficiency.
Modern embedded alternative with 6 cores.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BAlt
Modern embedded alternative with Vega graphics.
Quad-core alternative with ECC support.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Atom C3758Alt
Modern low-power embedded alternative.
Our Verdict on Each
A capable 2012 ultrabook chip, but its dual-core design is too slow for modern multitasking.
Best for: If you are considering a laptop with the Intel Core i7-3517U today, it should only be purchased in the used market at an extremely low price. It remains capable of very basic web browsing and document editing, but its 2-core design is a major bottleneck for modern multitasking. Avoid purchasing a laptop with this CPU if you need to do any modern productivity work, video editing, or gaming. It is best suited for budget-conscious buyers who need a cheap, secondary machine for light web browsing or for students on a very tight budget. For any primary computing needs, investing in a newer platform is strongly recommended for better efficiency, security, and performance.
Read the full reviewA reliable 2012 embedded chip with ECC support, but too slow for modern consumer workloads.
Best for: If you are considering the Intel Core i7-3555LE, you are likely maintaining an older industrial PC or a specialized embedded system. This processor should not be sought for consumer use, as its dual-core design is severely outdated for modern multitasking and productivity workloads. It is only recommended if you need to keep a specific legacy system running that requires a direct replacement part with ECC memory support. Avoid using this CPU for general web browsing or modern office work, as its performance is too low and inefficient. It is best utilized in its original context: low-power, always-on embedded systems where stability is paramount. For any new industrial builds, modern embedded processors offer vastly superior performance, security, and power efficiency.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-3517U or Intel Core i7-3555LE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-3555LE comes out ahead with a score of 5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-3517U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-3517U (17 W), Intel Core i7-3555LE (25 W).
Do Intel Core i7-3517U and Intel Core i7-3555LE use the same socket?
Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1023 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.