CPU Comparison
Intel Core i7-10810U vs Core i7-1195G7 (IPU)
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. Launched in April 2020, the Intel Core i7-10810U is a hexa-core mobile processor belonging to the 10th Gen Comet Lake-U family. It closely resembles the i7-10710U but is specifically tailored for OEMs, offering slightly tweaked clock speeds and a 25W TDP. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it provides robust multitasking capabilities for thin-and-light laptops. The processor operates at a 1.1 GHz base clock and can boost up to 4.9 GHz, ensuring strong single-threaded bursts for everyday tasks. Built on the 14nm process, it features 12MB of L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory. Its integrated UHD Graphics handle standard media playback and light gaming. While it doesn't bring architectural innovations over standard Comet Lake parts, it remains a reliable option for business and premium consumer laptops needing balanced performance. The higher 4.9 GHz turbo compared to the 10710U gives it a slight edge in single-core workloads.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Strong performance in office applications and multitasking.
5.0 GHz boost ensures maximum responsiveness for office tasks.
Gaming
Basic UHD graphics limit it to non-demanding titles.
Not targeted at gaming; limited to 4 PCIe lanes unlike the standard 1195G7.
Virtualization
12 threads handle virtualization well for a mobile chip.
Good for light VMs, but 4 cores limit heavy workloads.
Efficiency
14nm process limits efficiency compared to newer chips.
IPU offload significantly improves battery life during video calls.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI silicon
- Handles basic inferencing via CPU
- IPU 6.0 accelerates computer vision
- DLBoost for AI inference
- No dedicated NPU for general AI
Content Creation
Gaming
- Relies on UHD Graphics
- Not intended for gaming
- Iris Xe 96EU handles casual games
- Only 4 PCIe lanes limits dGPU bandwidth
- Not intended for gaming laptops
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 6 cores and 12 threads
- High 4.9 GHz turbo boost
- Good for multitasking
- 12MB L3 cache
Cons
- OEM exclusive, hard to find in retail
- 14nm process is outdated
- Low base clock
- Basic integrated graphics
Pros
- Dedicated IPU 6.0 for video conferencing
- 5.0 GHz single-core turbo
- Excellent battery life during calls
- Iris Xe 96EU graphics
Cons
- Only 4 PCIe 4.0 lanes
- 4 cores limit multi-threading
- End-of-life
- Niche feature set
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i7-10810U
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-10710URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-10610URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-8665URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Alt
Better single-core IPC and faster integrated graphics.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800UAlt
Superior multi-core performance and battery life.
More modern architecture often outperforms it in everyday tasks.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Vastly superior efficiency for similar productivity workloads.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 5 5625UAlt
Modern budget alternative with better multi-threading.
Core i7-1195G7 (IPU)
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1185G7Rival
Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1195G7Alt
Better for gaming with 16 PCIe lanes if IPU is unneeded.
- Intel Core i7-1280PAlt
Newer architecture with more cores and better efficiency.
- Alt
Superior efficiency and video processing.
Compare head-to-head Budget alternative for office use.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A solid OEM-specific 6-core processor that offers a slight frequency bump over the 10710U, making it excellent for business productivity and multitasking.
Best for: The Core i7-10810U is exclusively found in pre-built laptops, making it a factor only when shopping for used or refurbished business machines. It is a solid choice if you need a multitasking laptop for office work, heavy web browsing, and light content creation at a lower price point. The 6-core configuration ensures it can handle parallel tasks better than older 8th Gen chips. However, due to its 14nm heritage, battery life may suffer compared to newer laptops with 10nm or newer processors. Avoid paying a premium for this chip today; if the price is close to a laptop with an 11th Gen Intel or Ryzen 5000 processor, opt for the latter. It is best suited for budget-conscious buyers needing solid productivity performance.
Read the full reviewAn excellent processor for professionals, combining 5.0 GHz speeds with a dedicated image processing unit for superior webcam quality.
Best for: Professionals seeking a used premium business laptop with excellent webcam quality.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i7-10810U or Core i7-1195G7 (IPU)?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Core i7-1195G7 (IPU) comes out ahead with a score of 8.3/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i7-10810U or Core i7-1195G7 (IPU)?
For gaming, the Core i7-1195G7 (IPU) leads with a gaming performance score of 70/100 among Intel Core i7-10810U and Core i7-1195G7 (IPU).
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-10810U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i7-10810U (25 W), Core i7-1195G7 (IPU) (28 W).
Do Intel Core i7-10810U and Core i7-1195G7 (IPU) use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i7-10810U: Intel BGA 1440, Core i7-1195G7 (IPU): BGA 1449), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i7-10810U has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i7-10810U (6 cores), Core i7-1195G7 (IPU) (4 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Core i7-1195G7 (IPU) posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Core i7-1195G7 (IPU) (7,200). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.