CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4670S vs Intel Core i5-4570T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4670S, launched in June 2013, is a quad-core desktop processor designed for users who need strong performance within a constrained thermal envelope. As part of the Haswell generation, it features a 65-watt TDP, making it significantly more power-efficient than the standard 84-watt i5-4670. Operating at a base frequency of 3.1 GHz and turbo boosting up to 3.8 GHz, it delivers snappy single-threaded performance suitable for gaming and demanding applications. Built on a 22nm process, it houses 1.4 billion transistors and 6MB of L3 cache. The inclusion of Intel HD 4600 graphics ensures smooth 4K video playback and basic gaming capabilities. This processor was highly sought after for small form factor builds and home theater PCs where heat and noise reduction were priorities. It remains a capable chip for legacy systems and budget gaming setups.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Fast single-core speeds keep legacy apps feeling snappy.
Good single-core speed helps office apps, but dual-core limits heavy multitasking.
Gaming
Good for older games; will bottleneck modern GPUs in CPU-heavy titles.
HD 4600 graphics are insufficient for anything beyond very old or 2D games.
Virtualization
Limited to light VMs due to 4 threads.
Limited core count makes running VMs sluggish.
Efficiency
Outstanding efficiency, hitting 3.8 GHz on just 65W.
Excellent efficiency for a desktop chip, running very cool.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Slow for modern AI workloads
- No AI hardware
- Unsuitable for modern AI workloads
Content Creation
Gaming
- Pairs well with GTX 1050 Ti or RX 570
- Can handle CS:GO and Dota 2 easily
- Will struggle with modern CPU-bound games like Cyberpunk 2077
- Intel HD 4600 is too weak for modern gaming
- Can handle retro or 2D indie games
- Shares system memory
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- High 3.8 GHz turbo boost for single-core tasks
- Low 65W TDP
- Good for retro and e-sports gaming
- Supports vPro and TXT
- Reliable Haswell architecture
Cons
- Obsolete DDR3 platform
- Locked multiplier
- No Windows 11 support
- Bottlenecks modern GPUs
- Limited to 4 threads
Pros
- Very low 35W TDP for a desktop chip
- High turbo boost for single-threaded tasks
- Uses socketed LGA 1150
- Runs very cool and quiet
Cons
- Only 2 physical cores
- Obsolete DDR3 memory support
- Weak integrated graphics
- Locked multiplier
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4670S
- AMD FX-8350Rival
High-End Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570Rival
Standard Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4670KRival
Enthusiast Desktop
- AMD FX-6300Rival
Budget Desktop
- Intel Core i7-4770SRival
Low Power Desktop
Newer Haswell Refresh with slightly higher clocks.
Compare head-to-headHyper-threaded alternative for more threads.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 1300XAlt
Modern budget quad-core alternative.
Modern budget alternative.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 1600Alt
Modern budget hexa-core alternative.
Intel Core i5-4570T
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570SRival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570Rival
Desktop
- AMD A10-6800KRival
Desktop
- Intel Core i3-4340Rival
Desktop
- AMD A8-6600KRival
Desktop
Modern quad-core with vastly superior single-thread performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
Better integrated graphics and modern platform.
Cheap hex-core for budget desktop builds.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3600Alt
Excellent value and multi-threaded performance.
- Intel Pentium G4560Alt
Older but much cheaper dual-core alternative.
Our Verdict on Each
The fastest 'S' series Haswell i5 at launch, offering excellent single-core performance with 65W efficiency.
Best for: Drop-in upgrade for older LGA 1150 systems.
Read the full reviewAn efficient and cool-running chip for its time, but severely outdated by modern dual-core standards.
Best for: If you are considering the Core i5-4570T today, it should only be for upgrading an existing LGA 1150 system where your current chip is failing, or for building a very basic retro or office PC using salvaged parts. It holds no value for new purchases due to its age and lack of modern feature support. If found cheaply, it can serve as a capable home server or HTPC processor, handling media streaming and basic network tasks adequately. However, its dual-core limitation will be a bottleneck for modern web browsing with heavy scripts. Do not spend more than a few dollars on this processor. Anyone building a new system should look toward modern 12th or 13th Gen Intel alternatives, or AMD's Ryzen series, which offer vastly superior efficiency and performance.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4670S or Intel Core i5-4570T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-4670S comes out ahead with a score of 7.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4670S or Intel Core i5-4570T?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-4670S leads with a gaming performance score of 52/100 among Intel Core i5-4670S and Intel Core i5-4570T.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-4570T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4670S (65 W), Intel Core i5-4570T (35 W).
Do Intel Core i5-4670S and Intel Core i5-4570T use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4670S: LGA 1150, Intel Core i5-4570T: Intel Socket 1150 (LGA1150)), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i5-4670S has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-4670S (4 cores), Intel Core i5-4570T (2 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4670S posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4670S (3,900), Intel Core i5-4570T (3,800). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.