CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4570S vs Intel Core i5-7600T
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4570S is a quad-core desktop processor introduced in June 2013 as part of the Haswell generation. Designed with a 65-watt TDP, the 'S' suffix indicates its focus on power efficiency without sacrificing too much performance. Operating at a base frequency of 2.9 GHz and boosting up to 3.6 GHz, it provided a balanced approach for both everyday tasks and moderate workloads. Built on Intel's 22nm process, it packs 1.4 billion transistors into a 177 mm² die. This processor was a favorite for small form factor builds and home theater PCs (HTPCs) where heat dissipation was a priority. It features Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics, capable of handling 4K video playback and older games at low settings. With 6MB of L3 cache, it delivered snappy application responsiveness. While obsolete by today's standards, it was a highly regarded efficiency chip during its prime.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Snappy for basic tasks, 6MB cache helps responsiveness.
Handles everyday office tasks well but struggles with heavy multi-tasking due to 4 threads.
Gaming
Handles older games well but bottlenecks modern GPUs.
HD 630 graphics are only suitable for older or very light 2D games.
Virtualization
Can run basic VMs but limited by 4 threads.
Limited capability for virtual machines due to the lack of Hyper-Threading.
Efficiency
Excellent power-to-performance ratio for its generation.
Exceptional power efficiency tailored for 35W thermal envelopes.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Lacks modern AI instruction sets
- Not suitable for AI workloads
- No dedicated AI hardware
- Inference tasks will be extremely slow
Content Creation
Gaming
- Needs a dedicated GPU for 3D gaming
- Suitable for e-sports titles from the 2010s
- Will bottleneck any GPU newer than a GTX 1060
- Only suitable for legacy games
- HD 630 lacks the power for modern 3D titles
- Requires a discrete GPU for any serious gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Low 65W TDP ideal for SFF builds
- Strong single-core performance for its era
- Includes HD 4600 graphics
- Supports VT-d for virtualization
- 6MB L3 cache improves multitasking
Cons
- Uses obsolete DDR3 memory
- Locked multiplier
- No official Windows 11 support
- Bottlenecks modern GPUs
- Lacks modern I/O like USB 3.1 Gen 2
Pros
- Extremely low 35W TDP
- Good single-thread performance for basic tasks
- Hardware decoding for modern video codecs
- Ideal for fanless or compact SFF cases
- Affordable on the used market
Cons
- Lacks Hyper-Threading
- Low base clock of 2.8 GHz
- Weak integrated graphics
- Locked multiplier prevents overclocking
- Outperformed by modern low-power CPUs
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4570S
- AMD FX-8320ERival
Low Power Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-4570Rival
Standard Desktop
- AMD FX-6350Rival
Budget Desktop
- Intel Core i5-4440Rival
Budget Desktop
- AMD A10-6800KRival
High-End APU
Unlocked variant for overclocking.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i7-4770SAlt
Efficient hyper-threaded alternative for more threads.
Slightly newer Haswell Refresh with better clocks.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 1500XAlt
Modern budget alternative with SMT.
Much newer budget alternative with 6 cores.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i5-7600T
- AMD Ryzen 5 1400Rival
Desktop
- AMD Ryzen 3 1200Rival
Desktop
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-6500TRival
Desktop
- Intel Core i3-7100Rival
Desktop
- AMD A10-9700Rival
Desktop
Coffee Lake successor with 6 cores for much better multi-core performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 3400GEAlt
A low-power AMD alternative with better integrated graphics.
A slightly lower-tier alternative if cost is the primary concern.
Compare head-to-head- Intel NUC 11Alt
A complete modern compact system solution with vastly superior efficiency.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GEAlt
Another low-power desktop alternative with competitive performance.
Our Verdict on Each
A great efficiency-focused CPU for its time, still viable for basic legacy systems but not for modern workloads.
Best for: Drop-in upgrade for older LGA 1150 office PCs.
Read the full reviewAn efficient quad-core CPU for compact builds, but its low TDP limits multi-core performance and it lacks modern features like Hyper-Threading.
Best for: Building a silent, low-power mini PC for web browsing and office work using used parts.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4570S or Intel Core i5-7600T?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-4570S comes out ahead with a score of 6.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4570S or Intel Core i5-7600T?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-4570S leads with a gaming performance score of 45/100 among Intel Core i5-4570S and Intel Core i5-7600T.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-7600T has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4570S (65 W), Intel Core i5-7600T (35 W).
Do Intel Core i5-4570S and Intel Core i5-7600T use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4570S: LGA 1150, Intel Core i5-7600T: Intel Socket 1151), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-7600T posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4570S (3,600), Intel Core i5-7600T (4,400). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.