CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4200Y vs Intel Core i5-3365M
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4200Y is an ultra-low voltage dual-core processor introduced in mid-2013 as part of the 4th generation Core family. Designed specifically for the thinnest and lightest mobile devices, including tablets and 2-in-1 hybrids, it operates within a strict 12-watt thermal envelope. Despite its low power consumption, it features Hyper-Threading, allowing its two physical cores to process four threads simultaneously, which aids in basic multitasking. Running at a base frequency of 1.4 GHz with the ability to boost up to 1.9 GHz, it balances performance with extreme power efficiency. It also integrates Intel HD Graphics 4200, providing adequate visuals for media consumption and casual workloads. The chip was a cornerstone for the Windows tablet era, enabling fanless designs and all-day battery life while delivering sufficient computational power for everyday computing tasks like web browsing and document editing.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Struggles with modern multitasking.
Can handle basic office tasks but struggles with modern web applications and multitasking.
Gaming
Incapable of running modern titles.
Only suitable for very old or lightweight games at low resolutions and settings.
Virtualization
Not recommended for virtual machines.
Supports VT-x and VT-d, but only two cores limit practical virtual machine usage.
Efficiency
Excellent efficiency for its era.
Reasonable for a 2012 35 W mobile chip, but far less efficient than modern processors.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI hardware.
- No AI acceleration hardware
- No AVX2 or later instruction support
- Completely unsuitable for any AI workload
Content Creation
Gaming
- Only handles old or very light 2D games.
- Intel HD 4000 is vastly outdated for modern games
- Can handle games like Minecraft, Terraria, and older titles at low settings
- No dedicated GPU means no realistic path to modern gaming
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Extremely low 12W TDP
- Enabled fanless designs
- Good battery life
- Hardware video acceleration
Cons
- Very low clock speeds
- BGA soldered, no upgrades
- Obsolete for modern tasks
- Limited to 16GB DDR3
Pros
- Intel HD 4000 was a meaningful graphics leap for integrated solutions in 2012
- 22nm process improved power efficiency
- VT-x and VT-d virtualization support
- TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) for enterprise security
- AES-NI hardware encryption acceleration
Cons
- Only two cores, completely insufficient for modern multi-threaded workloads
- No AVX2 support limits newer software compatibility
- 35 W TDP is high by modern ultrabook standards
- No modern connectivity (USB 4, Thunderbolt)
- Obsolete for any current meaningful use case
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4200Y
- AMD A4-5000Rival
Mobile
- AMD A6-5200Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i3-4010YRival
Mobile
- Intel Atom Z3770Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-3317URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-4300YAlt
Slightly faster Y-series chip.
Better performance if you can handle 15W TDP.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core m3-6Y30Alt
Much newer and more efficient.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200UAlt
Vastly superior modern budget alternative.
- Intel Core i3-8130UAlt
Modern dual-core with much better IPC.
Intel Core i5-3365M
- AMD A10-4600MRival
Mobile Mainstream
- AMD A8-4500MRival
Mobile Budget
- Intel Core i7-3520MRival
Mobile Premium
- Intel Core i3-3110MRival
Mobile Entry
- AMD A6-4400MRival
Mobile Budget
- Intel Core i5-4200MAlt
Haswell successor with better power efficiency and slightly improved graphics.
Slightly higher-clocked Ivy Bridge alternative in a socketed package.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A pioneering chip for Windows tablets, but severely underpowered for modern workloads.
Best for: Retro computing or free hand-me-down device
Read the full reviewThe Core i5-3365M was a solid mid-range mobile processor in 2012, offering meaningful improvements over its Sandy Bridge predecessors in graphics and power efficiency. Today, it is obsolete for any demanding workload but can still handle basic tasks in older laptops.
Best for: Keeping an existing laptop with this processor functional for basic tasks
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4200Y or Intel Core i5-3365M?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-3365M comes out ahead with a score of 5.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4200Y or Intel Core i5-3365M?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-3365M leads with a gaming performance score of 25/100 among Intel Core i5-4200Y and Intel Core i5-3365M.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-4200Y has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4200Y (12 W), Intel Core i5-3365M (35 W).
Do Intel Core i5-4200Y and Intel Core i5-3365M use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4200Y: Intel BGA 1168, Intel Core i5-3365M: Intel BGA 1023), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4200Y posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4200Y (2,200), Intel Core i5-3365M (2,100). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.