CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-4200U vs Intel Core i5-4330M
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4200U is a dual-core, ultra-low voltage mobile processor launched in mid-2013 as part of the 4th Generation Core (Haswell) lineup. With a 15-watt TDP, it became the quintessential processor for the era's Ultrabooks, striking a balance between power efficiency and everyday performance. It features two physical cores and four threads thanks to Intel's Hyper-Threading technology, allowing it to handle multitasking with relative ease. The base clock speed is set at 1.6 GHz, dynamically boosting up to 2.6 GHz via Intel Turbo Boost technology when demanding workloads require extra performance. The processor is equipped with 3 MB of SmartCache and integrates Intel HD Graphics 4400, offering smooth 1080p video playback and the ability to play light casual games. It was a defining chip for mainstream thin-and-light laptops, offering an excellent blend of battery life and productivity performance.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Noticeable lag with modern multitasking.
The high 3.8 GHz turbo boost provides excellent single-threaded responsiveness for everyday tasks.
Gaming
Handles only old or 2D indie games.
HD 5000 graphics allow for playable framerates in older titles at 720p or 1080p on low settings.
Virtualization
Can run one light VM.
Can run light VMs with VT-d support, but dual-core limits multitasking.
Efficiency
Great battery life for its time.
37W TDP is standard for mobile but runs warmer than modern 15W chips.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No AI acceleration hardware.
- No AI hardware acceleration
- Dual-core CPU limits inference performance
Content Creation
Gaming
- HD 4400 is too weak for modern 3D games.
- Comparable to an entry-level discrete mobile GPU
- Can handle older games like Bioshock Infinite at low settings
- Not suitable for modern AAA titles
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent efficiency for 2013
- Good turbo boost frequency
- Hardware video encoding
- Wide adoption
Cons
- Only 2 cores
- BGA soldered
- Struggles with modern web
- No Windows 11 support
Pros
- High 3.8 GHz turbo boost for excellent single-threaded tasks
- Socketed design allows for upgrades
- HD 5000 graphics are capable for media
- Supports PCIe 3.0
Cons
- Only 2 physical cores
- 37W TDP runs warm
- End-of-life and outdated
- Locked multiplier
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-4200U
- AMD A10-5745MRival
Mobile
- AMD A8-5545MRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-4500URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i3-4010URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-3317URival
Mobile
Slightly faster refresh model.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i7-4600UAlt
Higher clocks and better graphics.
Broadwell successor with better efficiency.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i3-8130UAlt
Much faster modern budget chip.
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200UAlt
Superior modern alternative.
Intel Core i5-4330M
- AMD A10-5750MRival
Mobile APU
- Intel Core i7-4702MQRival
Mobile
- AMD A8-5550MRival
Mobile APU
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-3340MRival
Mobile
- AMD A6-5350MRival
Mobile APU
- Intel Core i7-4700MQAlt
A quad-core chip for the same Socket G3, offering a massive upgrade in multi-core performance.
- Intel Core i5-8250UAlt
A much faster 8th gen quad-core mobile chip that runs cooler and uses less power.
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAlt
A modern mobile quad-core with Vega graphics that vastly outperforms this chip.
A modern dual-core mobile chip that obliterates this i5 in performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GAlt
A budget desktop alternative if moving away from old mobile platforms.
Our Verdict on Each
A legendary battery-life champion in its day, but obsolete for modern multitasking.
Best for: Extremely cheap used laptop for basic text editing
Read the full reviewA solid step up from the 4300M, offering slightly higher clock speeds and strong single-core performance for its era, though obsolete by modern standards.
Best for: Upgrading an old Socket G3 laptop from a Celeron or Pentium to this i5 for cheap.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-4200U or Intel Core i5-4330M?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-4330M comes out ahead with a score of 6.5/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4200U or Intel Core i5-4330M?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-4330M leads with a gaming performance score of 46/100 among Intel Core i5-4200U and Intel Core i5-4330M.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-4200U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4200U (15 W), Intel Core i5-4330M (37 W).
Do Intel Core i5-4200U and Intel Core i5-4330M use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-4200U: Intel BGA 1168, Intel Core i5-4330M: Intel Socket G3), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-4200U posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4200U (3,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.