CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-4200U vs Intel Core i7-4558U

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-4200U is a dual-core, ultra-low voltage mobile processor launched in mid-2013 as part of the 4th Generation Core (Haswell) lineup. With a 15-watt TDP, it became the quintessential processor for the era's Ultrabooks, striking a balance between power efficiency and everyday performance. It features two physical cores and four threads thanks to Intel's Hyper-Threading technology, allowing it to handle multitasking with relative ease. The base clock speed is set at 1.6 GHz, dynamically boosting up to 2.6 GHz via Intel Turbo Boost technology when demanding workloads require extra performance. The processor is equipped with 3 MB of SmartCache and integrates Intel HD Graphics 4400, offering smooth 1080p video playback and the ability to play light casual games. It was a defining chip for mainstream thin-and-light laptops, offering an excellent blend of battery life and productivity performance.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-4200U
2C / 4T2.6 GHz15 W
5
Full review
Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-4558U
2C / 4T3.3 GHz28 W
5
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
Mobile
Generation
4th Gen
4th Gen Core i7
Launched
2013
2013
Status
Discontinued
End-of-life
Codename
Haswell
Haswell-ULT
Series
Core i5
Core i7
Family
4th Generation (Haswell)
Haswell
Predecessor
Ivy Bridge U-Series
Intel Core i7-3555LE
Successor
Broadwell U-Series
Intel Core i7-5557U

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
2
2
Threads
4
4
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
3 MB
4 MB
TDP
15 W
28 W
Architecture
Architecture
Haswell
Haswell-ULT
Process Node
22nm
22nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR3
DDR3
Memory Speed
DDR3-1600
1600 MT/s
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
16 GB
16 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
Intel BGA 1168
Intel BGA 1168
PCIe Version
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
PCIe Lanes
12
12
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-4200U30

Noticeable lag with modern multitasking.

Intel Core i7-4558UBest40

High clock speeds ensure good performance in office apps.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-4200U20

Handles only old or 2D indie games.

Intel Core i7-4558UBest25

Iris 5100 allows for playable frame rates in older or well-optimized games.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-4200U15

Can run one light VM.

Intel Core i7-4558UBest20

Capable of running one light VM, but limited by 2 cores.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-4200UBest80

Great battery life for its time.

Intel Core i7-4558U30

28W TDP is warmer than 15W parts but justified by performance.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-4200UNone
  • No AI acceleration hardware.
Intel Core i7-4558UNone
  • No dedicated AI hardware

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-4200UVery Poor
Basic Photo Editing
Intel Core i7-4558UFair
Basic PhotoshopLight 1080p Editing

Gaming

Intel Core i5-4200UPoor
  • HD 4400 is too weak for modern 3D games.
Intel Core i7-4558UPoor
  • Iris 5100 is a major step up from HD 4400
  • Can run older games at low settings
  • Not suitable for modern AAA titles

Industry Impact

Gaming
Low
Moderate
Workstations
Low
Low
Content Creation
Moderate
Moderate
Virtualization
Low
Low

Best CPU by Use Case

Office Applications
Acceptable
Web Browsing
Slow
Video Playback
Good
Gaming
Poor
Video Editing
Fair
Programming
Good
Light Gaming
Fair
Productivity
Very Good
Photo Editing
Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Content Creators
Developers
Workstation Users
Streamers
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i5-4200U

Pros

  • Excellent efficiency for 2013
  • Good turbo boost frequency
  • Hardware video encoding
  • Wide adoption

Cons

  • Only 2 cores
  • BGA soldered
  • Struggles with modern web
  • No Windows 11 support
Intel Core i7-4558U

Pros

  • High 3.3 GHz boost clock
  • Iris 5100 graphics with eDRAM
  • 28W TDP allows good sustained performance
  • Excellent single-core speed

Cons

  • Runs warmer than 15W U-series chips
  • Soldered to motherboard
  • 22nm process is outdated
  • Only 2 cores

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i7-4558U

Our Verdict on Each

A legendary battery-life champion in its day, but obsolete for modern multitasking.

Best for: Extremely cheap used laptop for basic text editing

Read the full review

A premium 28W mobile CPU that combined high clock speeds with Iris graphics, delivering an excellent balance of CPU and GPU performance for 2013.

Best for: If you are considering a laptop with the Intel Core i7-4558U, you are likely looking at a used MacBook Pro or a premium ultrabook. This processor remains capable for everyday productivity, programming, and light 1080p video editing. The inclusion of Iris 5100 graphics provides a noticeable boost in graphical tasks compared to standard U-series chips. It is an excellent choice for users who need a compact, moderately powerful machine without paying the premium for modern hardware. However, be aware that it is an older Intel-based Mac, meaning it will eventually lose macOS support. Avoid this processor if you need to run modern AAA games or heavy 3D rendering workloads. It is best purchased at a discount for general use.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-4200U or Intel Core i7-4558U?

For gaming, the Intel Core i7-4558U leads with a gaming performance score of 25/100 among Intel Core i5-4200U and Intel Core i7-4558U.

Which uses less power?

The Intel Core i5-4200U has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-4200U (15 W), Intel Core i7-4558U (28 W).

Do Intel Core i5-4200U and Intel Core i7-4558U use the same socket?

Yes — all of these CPUs use the Intel BGA 1168 socket, so they share compatible motherboards.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-4200U posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-4200U (3,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.