CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Core i5-1250P
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor launched in September 2020. Built on the 10nm SuperFIN process, it utilizes the Willow Cove microarchitecture. Designed for thin-and-light laptops, it operates at a 15W TDP with a base clock of 1.5 GHz and a turbo boost up to 4.2 GHz. It features the highly capable Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 80 Execution Units, bringing significant gaming and media improvements to the ultrabook segment.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Snappy performance for everyday office tasks and multitasking.
12 cores handle heavy multitasking, large spreadsheets, and application switching effortlessly.
Gaming
Capable of playing e-sports titles and older games at 1080p thanks to Iris Xe graphics.
Capable of playing esports titles and older games at 1080p using integrated graphics.
Virtualization
Can handle light virtualization but is limited by 4 cores.
Good for running a local VM or two for development purposes.
Efficiency
Excellent power efficiency due to the 10nm SuperFIN process.
Excellent performance-per-watt, ensuring long battery life during mixed-use workloads.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- DLBoost and GNA 2.0 provide solid AI acceleration for background blur and noise cancellation.
- Suitable for basic edge AI tasks and background blur features.
- Lacks dedicated AI hardware acceleration.
Content Creation
Gaming
- Iris Xe 80EU allows for smooth e-sports gaming.
- Performance scales heavily with dual-channel memory.
- Not suitable for modern AAA gaming at high settings.
- Iris Xe 80EU handles older or low-demand titles well.
- Not suitable for modern AAA gaming without a discrete GPU.
- Hardware video decoding is excellent for media consumption.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Excellent single-core performance
- Massive leap in integrated graphics (Iris Xe 80EU)
- Great power efficiency
- Supports fast LPDDR4X-4267 memory
- Includes PCIe 4.0 for fast storage
Cons
- Limited to 4 cores
- Integrated graphics still weaker than entry-level discrete GPUs
- Soldered onto the motherboard (BGA package)
- Replaced quickly by 12th Gen P-series and U-series
Pros
- 12 cores and 16 threads in a 28W package
- Iris Xe 80EU graphics with high boost clock
- Excellent performance-per-watt
- Supports DDR5 and LPDDR5 memory
- Great for heavy multitasking
Cons
- Not unlocked for overclocking
- Soldered to the motherboard (BGA)
- Can throttle under sustained 100% load in poorly cooled chassis
- Integrated graphics still limited for serious gaming
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-1135G7
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-1035G1Rival
Mobile
- Intel Core i7-1165G7Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600UAlt
Provides better multi-core performance with 6 cores.
Budget alternative with 2 cores for basic office tasks.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 5800UAlt
Excellent 8-core alternative for heavy multitasking.
Newer 12th gen alternative with more cores and better efficiency.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i5-1250P
- AMD Ryzen 5 6600URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800URival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-1260PRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M2Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 5625URival
Mobile
Slightly cheaper with near-identical performance, just a lower iGPU clock.
Compare head-to-headBetter battery life for standard ultrabook use.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 6800UAlt
Superior integrated graphics performance.
More power and cores if laptop thickness isn't a concern.
Compare head-to-head- Alt
Better battery life and efficiency in the Apple ecosystem.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A breakthrough mobile chip that brought console-like integrated graphics to thin-and-light laptops, though limited to 4 cores.
Best for: Buying a mid-range ultrabook for everyday use and light gaming.
Read the full reviewAn excellent 28W processor that brings 12 cores and Iris Xe graphics to the thin-and-light category, balancing power and portability perfectly.
Best for: Buying a premium thin-and-light laptop for heavy productivity and light content creation.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Intel Core i5-1135G7 or Intel Core i5-1250P?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i5-1250P comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Intel Core i5-1135G7 or Intel Core i5-1250P?
For gaming, the Intel Core i5-1135G7 leads with a gaming performance score of 75/100 among Intel Core i5-1135G7 and Intel Core i5-1250P.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-1135G7 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-1135G7 (15 W), Intel Core i5-1250P (28 W).
Do Intel Core i5-1135G7 and Intel Core i5-1250P use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-1135G7: Intel BGA 1449, Intel Core i5-1250P: Intel BGA 1744), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core i5-1250P has the most cores. Core counts: Intel Core i5-1135G7 (4 cores), Intel Core i5-1250P (12 cores).
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-1135G7 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.