GizWires logo
GizWires logo

Follow Us

CPU Comparison

Intel Core i5-10600 vs Intel Core i7-8700

A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-10600 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor hitting high turbo frequencies of 4.8 GHz, making it a strong contender for high-refresh-rate gaming and responsive productivity.

Intel · Core i5
Intel Core i5-10600
6C / 12T4.8 GHz65 W
8.5
Full review
Top pick
Intel · Core i7
Intel Core i7-8700
6C / 12T4.6 GHz65 W
9
Full review

The Bottom Line

Overview & Launch

Brand
Intel
Intel
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
Desktop
Generation
10th Gen Core i5
Core i7 (Coffee Lake)
Launched
2020
2017
Status
Active
End-of-life
Codename
Comet Lake
Coffee Lake
Series
Core i5
Core i7
Family
10th Generation
8th Generation
Predecessor
Intel Core i5-9600
Intel Core i7-7700
Successor
Intel Core i5-11600
Intel Core i7-9700

Specifications Compared

Cores & Clocks
Cores
6
6
Threads
12
12
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Cache & Power
L3 Cache
12 MB
12 MB
TDP
65 W
65 W
Architecture
Architecture
Comet Lake
Coffee Lake
Process Node
14 nm
14nm
Memory
Memory Type
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Speed
2666 MT/s
2666 MT/s
Memory Channels
Dual (2)
Dual (2)
Max Memory
128 GB
128 GB
Platform & I/O
Socket
LGA 1200
Intel Socket 1151
PCIe Version
PCIe 3.0
Gen 3
PCIe Lanes
16
16
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
Unlocked
No
No

Performance Compared

Productivity

Intel Core i5-1060082

High clocks make everyday tasks and application launches feel instantaneous.

Intel Core i7-8700Best90

12 threads crush office workloads and compiling tasks.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-1060088

Excellent high-refresh-rate gaming performance thanks to 4.8 GHz boost.

Intel Core i7-870088

Capable of handling modern GPUs without significant bottlenecking.

Virtualization

Intel Core i5-1060075

Handles virtualization workloads comfortably.

Intel Core i7-8700Best88

Excellent for home labs and running multiple VMs.

Efficiency

Intel Core i5-1060060

Higher clocks result in increased power draw under load compared to lower i5 models.

Intel Core i7-8700Best88

Highly efficient 65W design for the performance offered.

Specialized Performance

AI / ML

Intel Core i5-10600Limited
  • No dedicated AI hardware
  • Fast clock speeds help with CPU-based inference tasks
Intel Core i7-8700Limited
  • No AI hardware
  • Good CPU inference due to 12 threads

Content Creation

Intel Core i5-10600Very Good
Premiere ProPhotoshopAfter Effects3D Rendering
Intel Core i7-8700Very Good
Adobe SuiteDaVinci ResolveBlenderUnreal Engine

Gaming

Intel Core i5-10600Excellent
  • Ideal for 144Hz+ gaming
  • Minimizes bottlenecks with high-end GPUs
  • High single-core speed is a major advantage
Intel Core i7-8700Excellent
  • Handles RTX 3070/3080 class GPUs well
  • High turbo boost ensures high frame rates
  • Great for 144Hz gaming

Industry Impact

Gaming
High
High
Workstations
Moderate
High
Content Creation
Moderate
High
Virtualization
Moderate
High

Best CPU by Use Case

High-Refresh 1080p Gaming
Excellent
1440p Gaming
Very Good
Excellent
Productivity
Excellent
Coding
Very Good
Media Consumption
Excellent
1080p Video Editing
Excellent
Streaming
Very Good
Programming
Excellent
4K Gaming (with high-end GPU)
Good

Target Audience

Gamers
Targeted
Targeted
Content Creators
Targeted
Targeted
Developers
Targeted
Targeted
Workstation Users
Targeted
Streamers
Targeted
Targeted
Office / Productivity
Targeted
Targeted
Students
Targeted

Strengths & Weaknesses

Intel Core i5-10600

Pros

  • Very high 4.8 GHz turbo boost
  • 6 cores and 12 threads
  • Excellent single-threaded performance
  • Includes integrated graphics
  • Aggressive out-of-the-box turbo behavior

Cons

  • Locked multiplier
  • Higher power draw under load
  • Limited to PCIe 3.0
  • Memory speed capped at 2666 MT/s natively
Intel Core i7-8700

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance
  • 6 cores / 12 threads
  • 4.6 GHz turbo boost
  • Easy to cool

Cons

  • Locked multiplier
  • Older 14nm process
  • Limited to PCIe 3.0
  • Platform is dead (LGA 1151)

Competitors & Alternatives

Intel Core i5-10600

Intel Core i7-8700

Our Verdict on Each

Offering near-flagship i5 clock speeds out of the box, the i5-10600 is an excellent choice for gamers who want top-tier performance without needing to overclock.

Best for: The Intel Core i5-10600 is recommended for gamers and power users who want maximum out-of-the-box single-threaded performance without the hassle of overclocking. Its 4.8 GHz turbo boost makes it exceptionally capable for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, easily keeping up with high-end GPUs. It is an excellent choice for pre-built systems or custom builds where the user wants top-tier i5 performance but doesn't want to spend extra on a Z-series motherboard and expensive cooling required for an unlocked K-series chip. Because it hits such high frequencies, a decent aftermarket cooler is recommended to sustain boost clocks. It is perfect for users who value instant, reliable performance for gaming and daily tasks, though those needing PCIe 4.0 should look to newer generations.

Read the full review

One of the best value desktop processors of its generation, offering 95% of the i7-8700K's performance at a lower price and power draw.

Best for: Upgrading an existing LGA 1151 system for high-refresh gaming.

Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Intel Core i5-10600 or Intel Core i7-8700?

Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-8700 comes out ahead with a score of 9/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.

Do Intel Core i5-10600 and Intel Core i7-8700 use the same socket?

No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-10600: LGA 1200, Intel Core i7-8700: Intel Socket 1151), so each needs a compatible motherboard.

Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?

The Intel Core i5-10600 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-10600 (16,700), Intel Core i7-8700 (15,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.