CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-1035G4 vs Intel Core i5-8269U
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Intel Core i5-1035G4 is a mid-tier mobile processor launched in August 2019 as part of the 10th Gen Ice Lake-U family. Built on Intel's 10nm process, it utilizes the Sunny Cove microarchitecture and features four cores and eight threads, making it well-suited for multitasking and everyday productivity. With a base clock of 1.1 GHz and a max turbo frequency of 3.7 GHz, it offers responsive performance in thin-and-light laptops. The processor operates at a 15-watt TDP, balancing power consumption and thermal output. A defining characteristic of the G4 variant is its inclusion of Intel Iris Plus graphics with 48 execution units, sitting between the lower-end UHD graphics and the higher-end 64-EU Iris Plus. This makes it capable of smooth 4K media playback and casual gaming. With support for LPDDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3, the i5-1035G4 provides a versatile foundation for portable computing devices requiring a step up in graphical performance.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Strong single and multi-core performance for daily office work and multitasking.
High base clock and 28W TDP ensure excellent sustained productivity performance.
Gaming
The 48-EU graphics can handle older games and e-sports titles at lower settings.
Iris Plus graphics allow for playable framerates in older or well-optimized titles.
Virtualization
Adequate for light VMs, though limited by 4 cores.
Good for running light VMs and development environments.
Efficiency
10nm process ensures good battery life in standard 15W configurations.
Balances power and performance well, though hotter than 15W chips.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Lacks DL Boost found in higher-end models
- Capable of basic AI inference
- eDRAM helps with memory-bound compute tasks
- No dedicated AI hardware
Content Creation
Gaming
- 48 Execution Units provide decent graphical headroom
- Can run CS:GO and Valorant smoothly
- Not suitable for modern AAA games at high settings
- Iris Plus 655 with eDRAM
- Capable of 720p/1080p gaming on low settings for older titles
- Thermal limits may restrict sustained GPU boost
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Iris Plus graphics with 48 EUs
- Good single-thread performance
- 10nm power efficiency
- Native Thunderbolt 3 support
- Decent casual gaming capability
Cons
- Not as graphically powerful as the G7 variant
- Soldered to motherboard
- Outperformed by newer AMD and Intel chips
- Can thermal throttle under heavy load in thin laptops
Pros
- Strong sustained performance with 28W TDP
- Iris Plus 655 graphics with eDRAM
- High base and turbo clock speeds
- Excellent for compact form factor PCs
Cons
- Soldered to the motherboard (BGA 1356)
- More expensive than standard 15W U-series chips
- Integrated graphics still limit gaming potential
- Older 14nm process
Competitors & Alternatives
Intel Core i5-1035G4
- AMD Ryzen 5 3550URival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 3750HRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-1035G1Rival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-1065G7Rival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 3500URival
Mobile
Tiger Lake successor with significantly better graphics and IPC.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 5 5600UAlt
Better efficiency and multi-core performance.
Modern alternative with vastly superior multi-core performance.
Compare head-to-head- AMD Ryzen 7 4700UAlt
Stronger multi-core alternative in the same category.
Higher graphical performance alternative (64 EUs).
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i5-8269U
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500URival
Mobile
- Intel Core i5-8259URival
Mobile (Premium)
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600HRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-8559URival
Mobile (Premium)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-8305GRival
Mobile (HBM)
- Intel Core i5-8279UAlt
Newer 9th gen equivalent with slightly better clocks.
- Alt
Vastly superior performance and efficiency in the Mac mini.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 5 4600UAlt
More cores and better efficiency in a 15W envelope.
Desktop equivalent with similar performance.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core i3-8100HAlt
Cheaper quad-core alternative if graphics are less important.
Our Verdict on Each
A balanced mobile processor that combines Sunny Cove architecture with 48-EU Iris Plus graphics, offering a good middle ground for multimedia tasks.
Best for: Purchasing a mid-range used laptop for light creative work and media consumption.
Read the full reviewA powerful 28W mobile chip offering higher sustained clocks and Iris Plus graphics, making it ideal for premium compact computing.
Best for: Buying a used Mac mini or premium ultrabook for a compact home server or office machine.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-1035G4 has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-1035G4 (15 W), Intel Core i5-8269U (28 W).
Do Intel Core i5-1035G4 and Intel Core i5-8269U use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Intel Core i5-1035G4: Intel BGA 1526, Intel Core i5-8269U: Intel BGA 1356), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i5-1035G4 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i5-1035G4 (7,800), Intel Core i5-8269U (7,400). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.