CPU Comparison
Apple M4 Pro vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M4 Pro is a high‑performance ARM‑based system‑on‑a‑chip (SoC) for professional MacBook Pro laptops, featuring a 12‑ or 14‑core CPU with up to 10 performance cores and a 16‑ or 20‑core GPU, built on a second‑generation 3 nm process and paired with high‑bandwidth unified memory.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16‑core Neural Engine up to 38 TOPS INT8 across M4 family.
- CPU ML accelerators and GPU compute are suitable for on‑device inference and moderate LLM workloads.
- Larger LLMs still limited by unified memory size and lack of dedicated high‑bandwidth HBM.
- NPU 5 with 50 TOPS INT8 and strong GPU AI throughput.
- Intel shows up to ~5.5× better GPU AI vs older Raptor Lake‑P and large leads vs some AMD Strix Point competitors in Geekbench AI and UL Procyon AI workloads.
- Well suited for local small‑medium LLMs, AI background effects and image generation.
Content Creation
Gaming
- 20‑core GPU is significantly faster than previous M3 Pro GPU.
- Hardware ray tracing and mesh shading improve modern API support.
- Most AAA games still run via emulation; performance and compatibility vary.
- Native Apple‑silicon titles can approach mid‑range discrete laptop GPU levels.
- Arc B390 with 12 Xe3 cores is a major step up from Arc 140V/Xe2 iGPUs.
- Fine for 1080p medium/high in many esports and AAA titles with upscaling.
- Still not a match for a dedicated RTX 4050/4060 laptop GPU at higher settings.
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Very high single‑threaded and multi‑threaded CPU performance.
- Up to 20‑core GPU with hardware ray tracing.
- High memory bandwidth (273 GB/s) for unified memory.
- Excellent performance per watt; long battery life in MacBook Pros.
- Tight integration with macOS and pro app ecosystem.
- Thunderbolt 5 support on M4 Pro/Max MacBook Pros.
Cons
- Soldered, non‑upgradeable RAM and storage.
- Limited x86 Windows game compatibility without emulation.
- No official overclocking support.
- Maximum 64 GB unified memory may limit very large models.
- Entirely dependent on Apple’s repair and upgrade ecosystem.
Pros
- 16 hybrid cores with strong multi‑thread performance for mobile
- Arc B390 iGPU is a huge generational leap over older Intel iGPUs
- 50 TOPS NPU enables serious local AI workloads
- Intel 18A brings improved efficiency and performance over Arrow Lake
- Supports LPDDR5X‑9600 and up to 96 GB memory
- Good balance of performance and power for thin designs
Cons
- Only 12 PCIe lanes from the CPU, limiting multi‑GPU / heavy NVMe configs
- Locked multiplier limits enthusiast tuning
- Not intended for desktop‑class sustained workloads at very high TDP
- Platform is still new; early firmware and driver stacks are maturing
- Higher‑end X9 model offers more GPU and CPU headroom in the same family
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M4 Pro
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Rival
High‑End Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 9 288VRival
High‑End Mobile
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite ExtremeRival
High‑End ARM Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HXRival
High‑End Mobile
- Intel Core Ultra 9 275HXRival
High‑End Mobile
- Apple M4 MaxAlt
More GPU cores and higher memory bandwidth for heavier GPU workloads.
- Alt
Lower cost and sufficient for many users who don’t need the extra CPU/GPU headroom.
Compare head-to-head - Alt
Older but often discounted; still strong for many pro workloads.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 laptopAlt
Better x86 Windows compatibility and often stronger gaming performance.
- Intel Core Ultra 9 288V laptopAlt
Good Windows alternative with strong single‑threaded performance and x86 compatibility.
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
- Compare head-to-headAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470Rival
High-End Mobile AI APU
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Rival
High-End Mobile AI APU
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285HRival
High-End Mobile (Arrow Lake-H)
- Apple M5 Pro (10‑core CPU)Rival
Premium Mobile SoC
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E‑84‑100Rival
ARM-based AI PC SoC
Higher‑end Panther Lake SKU with more GPU headroom and slightly higher clocks if you need maximum iGPU performance.
Compare head-to-head- Intel Core Ultra 7 265HAlt
Arrow Lake‑H alternative if you prefer DDR5 SO‑DIMMs and more traditional platform features over Panther Lake’s iGPU and NPU upgrades.
- Apple M5 Pro (15‑core)Alt
Best‑in‑class efficiency and CPU performance per watt on macOS, if you’re not tied to x86.
Our Verdict on Each
A very efficient, high‑performance pro SoC that pushes single‑threaded and multi‑threaded CPU performance while retaining excellent battery life and strong integrated graphics, though it is soldered and locked to Apple’s ecosystem.
Best for: Professionals and advanced creators who need a power‑efficient laptop with strong CPU and GPU performance, long battery life, and macOS ecosystem.
Read the full reviewA very strong mobile SoC for AI PCs and premium thin-and-lights, offering excellent CPU multi-thread, a huge iGPU leap and serious NPU performance, though platform PCIe constraints and locked multiplier limit enthusiast tuning.
Best for: You want a thin‑and‑light AI PC or premium business laptop where strong CPU, iGPU and NPU performance matter more than maximum PCIe expansion or overclocking.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M4 Pro or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M4 Pro comes out ahead with a score of 9.1/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M4 Pro or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H?
For gaming, the Apple M4 Pro leads with a gaming performance score of 82/100 among Apple M4 Pro and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (25 W).
Do Apple M4 Pro and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M4 Pro: On‑package (BGA), Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: FCBGA2540), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H has the most cores. Core counts: Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (16 cores).