CPU Comparison
Apple M2 vs Intel Core i5-13420H
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The Apple M2 is a second‑generation 5 nm ARM‑based system‑on‑chip for Macs, with an 8‑core CPU, up to a 10‑core GPU, 16‑core Neural Engine, and 100 GB/s unified memory bandwidth, designed for thin‑and‑light laptops and compact desktops.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Very strong single‑thread and good multi‑thread performance for everyday apps and light creator workloads.
Solid multi-core performance for mobile form factors.
Gaming
Solid for 1080p and many 1440p titles at medium–high settings; not intended for high‑refresh 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing.
Good for light gaming via iGPU, but pairs best with a mobile dGPU.
Virtualization
Capable of light VM/container use, but limited to 8 threads and not aimed at heavy server workloads.
Adequate for light VMs on the go.
Efficiency
Outstanding performance per watt; typically around 20 W CPU package power under multi‑threaded load, far below comparable x86 ultrabook chips.
Good efficiency, though 45W requires active cooling.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- 16‑core Neural Engine at 15.8 TOPS
- Good for on‑device inference and Core ML workloads
- No large‑scale training focus; more for consumer features than datacenter AI
- Can handle local inference
- Lacks NPU
- GPU acceleration recommended
Content Creation
Gaming
- Integrated 8–10 core GPU with up to 3.6 TFLOPS FP32
- Good for 1080p and some 1440p gaming at medium–high settings
- Limited by unified memory bandwidth and 8 CPU threads for CPU‑heavy titles
- Best experienced in macOS; Windows via virtualization or translation has overhead
- Iris Xe 80EU handles esports titles
- Pairs well with RTX 4050 mobile
- 4.6 GHz boost helps single-threaded games
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Very strong single‑core performance for an ultrabook‑class chip
- Integrated 8–10 core GPU with up to 3.6 TFLOPS and hardware ProRes acceleration
- Unified memory architecture with 100 GB/s bandwidth simplifies development and avoids CPU–GPU copies
- 16‑core Neural Engine accelerates on‑device ML workloads
- Fanless designs in MacBook Air and very quiet operation under typical loads
Cons
- Not sold as a standalone CPU; only available inside Macs
- No user‑upgradable RAM or PCIe slots; I/O limited to what Apple provides
- Only 8 CPU threads; heavy multi‑threaded workloads are limited compared to higher‑core M2 Pro/Max or x86 chips
- CPU efficiency is slightly worse than M1 at maximum performance due to higher clocks and power
- Gaming performance is constrained by 8 threads and integrated GPU; not a gaming‑focused SoC
Pros
- Good 8-core hybrid layout for mobile
- Supports fast DDR5 and LPDDR5 memory
- Includes Iris Xe 80EU graphics
- 45W base power is manageable for laptop cooling
- Supports PCIe 5.0 storage
Cons
- Only 4 P-cores limit heavy single-threaded bursts
- 12MB L3 cache is lower than desktop variants
- BGA1744 socket means it cannot be upgraded
- Lacks an NPU for dedicated AI tasks
Competitors & Alternatives
Apple M2
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800URival
Ultrabook
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7‑1260PRival
Ultrabook
- Intel Core i7‑1355URival
Ultrabook
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730URival
Ultrabook
- Compare head-to-headApple M1Rival
Ultrabook
- Alt
More CPU/GPU cores and higher memory bandwidth for heavier creator workloads.
Compare head-to-head - AMD Ryzen 7 7840UAlt
Stronger multi‑threaded performance and better x86 Windows compatibility in ultrabook form factors.
- Intel Core Ultra 7 155HAlt
Good balance of CPU and integrated GPU performance for Windows ultrabooks with NPU‑accelerated AI features.
- Alt
Newer architecture with higher performance and better efficiency if you are buying a new Mac in 2024+.
Compare head-to-head
Intel Core i5-13420H
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HSRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HSRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i5-12450HRival
Mobile
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-13620HRival
Mobile
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535HSRival
Mobile
- Core i7-13620HAlt
If you need more cores for heavy mobile productivity.
- Ryzen 5 7640HSAlt
Strong AMD alternative with slightly better iGPU.
If you want a thinner laptop with 28W power.
Compare head-to-head- Ryzen 7 7735HSAlt
More cores and strong integrated graphics.
- Core i5-12450HAlt
Older generation but still capable for budget laptops.
Our Verdict on Each
A very efficient, well‑balanced SoC that makes more sense inside a Mac than as a standalone chip; strong single‑core performance, capable integrated graphics, and excellent efficiency, but not a workstation‑class part.
Best for: You are buying a new or refurbished Mac laptop or desktop and want a significant step up from Intel‑based Macs or older M1 models, especially for single‑threaded tasks and GPU‑accelerated apps.
Read the full reviewA solid mobile processor offering excellent multi-core performance for mid-range laptops, though it trails in single-core speed compared to higher HX models.
Best for: The Core i5-13420H is recommended for buyers looking at mid-range gaming laptops or performance-oriented student laptops. It provides an excellent balance of multi-core performance for schoolwork or coding, and battery efficiency for on-the-go use. If you are buying a laptop with an RTX 4050 or 4060 mobile GPU, this CPU will not bottleneck the system in most modern games. It is also suitable for light 1080p video editing. Buyers should ensure the laptop has adequate cooling, as 45W chips can throttle if the chassis is too thin. It should be avoided by professional content creators who need maximum multi-threaded rendering, who should instead look for HX-series chips with more cores. For mainstream mobile users, the 13420H is a highly capable and efficient choice.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Apple M2 or Intel Core i5-13420H?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Apple M2 comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, Apple M2 or Intel Core i5-13420H?
For gaming, the Apple M2 leads with a gaming performance score of 78/100 among Apple M2 and Intel Core i5-13420H.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i5-13420H has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: Intel Core i5-13420H (45 W).
Do Apple M2 and Intel Core i5-13420H use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (Apple M2: On‑Package (BGA), Intel Core i5-13420H: Intel BGA 1744), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Apple M2 posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Apple M2 (9,800). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.