CPU Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core i7-11850HE
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 APU for commercial AI PCs and mobile workstations, featuring a 16-CU RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU, an XDNA 2 NPU, and support for up to 192GB of unified LPDDR5X memory.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Solid single-core and moderate multi-core performance handles commercial applications well, though it lags behind 12+ core models in heavy rendering.
Excellent multi-threaded throughput for compiling and edge data processing.
Gaming
The 16-CU integrated GPU is suitable for casual or older games but struggles with modern AAA titles at high settings.
Capable of gaming if placed in a consumer chassis, but rarely used for such.
Virtualization
Good for running several VMs, greatly benefiting from the massive memory pool rather than raw CPU compute.
16 threads and vPro support make it ideal for edge virtualization.
Efficiency
With fewer cores to feed, the 485 often operates more efficiently than the 490 or 495 under similar workloads.
35W base TDP is highly efficient for an 8-core industrial chip.
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- Memory capacity is the primary bottleneck for AI; the 485 solves this with 192GB support.
- Can load massive LLMs that discrete GPUs simply cannot fit.
- NPU handles Copilot+ PC requirements efficiently.
- AVX-512 and DL Boost accelerate edge AI inferencing
- Can handle medium-sized local models
Content Creation
Gaming
- 16 Compute Units provide basic graphical capability.
- Suitable for 1080p Low/Medium settings in e-sports titles.
- Not intended for high-fidelity gaming.
- Benefits from fast LPDDR5X memory bandwidth.
- Not intended for gaming, but architecture is identical to mobile i7-11800H
- Pairs well with discrete edge GPUs
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- Access to 192GB unified memory at the lowest price point in the lineup.
- Highly efficient 8-core Zen 5 CPU.
- XDNA 2 NPU with 50 TOPS performance.
- Enterprise-grade PRO manageability and security features.
- Lower thermal requirements compared to 12/16-core models.
Cons
- Only 8 CPU cores may bottleneck data processing tasks.
- 16-CU iGPU is weak for graphical workloads.
- Limited PCIe 4.0 lanes compared to desktop workstations.
- Locked multiplier restricts traditional overclocking.
- High system cost due to expensive LPDDR5X memory.
Pros
- Long-term embedded availability
- 8 cores and 24MB L3 cache
- Intel vPro and SIPP support
- Configurable TDP for rugged environments
Cons
- Hard to source for consumers
- Locked multiplier
- BGA soldered, requiring specialized motherboards
- Does not support DDR5
Competitors & Alternatives
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485
- Compare head-to-headApple M4 ProRival
Mobile Workstation
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 7 265HRival
Mobile AI PC
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X EliteRival
Mobile AI PC
- Intel Core i7-1465URival
Commercial Mobile
- Compare head-to-headApple M4Rival
Premium Laptop
Choose the 490 if you need 12 CPU cores and a 32-CU GPU for heavier rendering tasks alongside the memory.
Compare head-to-head- Apple MacBook Pro with M4 ProAlt
Better CPU and GPU performance per dollar, but limited to a maximum of 48GB unified memory.
- High-end Laptop with RTX 4070Alt
Much better gaming and graphics performance, but limited to 16-32GB of VRAM.
- Desktop Workstation (Threadripper / Xeon)Alt
Better upgradeability and PCIe expansion if portability is not required.
- Cloud AI ComputeAlt
More cost-effective if you only need 192GB of memory for occasional tasks.
Intel Core i7-11850HE
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748Rival
Embedded Mobile
- AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544Rival
Embedded Mobile
- Intel Xeon W-11865MRival
Mobile Workstation
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core i7-11800HRival
High-Performance Mobile
- Intel Atom x6425ERival
Embedded Low-Power
For slightly higher clock speeds in an embedded form factor.
Compare head-to-headAnother embedded/NUC focused Tiger Lake-H part.
Compare head-to-head
Our Verdict on Each
A unique entry point into the 192GB unified memory ecosystem, offering essential AI and workstation capabilities in a more cost-effective and thermally efficient package than its higher-end siblings.
Best for: Developers or researchers who need to run large AI models locally on a budget, where memory capacity is more critical than CPU speed.
Read the full reviewA robust embedded processor offering excellent multi-threaded performance and long-term availability for industrial applications.
Best for: Designing industrial PCs or edge servers requiring long-term availability
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 or Intel Core i7-11850HE?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core i7-11850HE comes out ahead with a score of 8.8/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 or Intel Core i7-11850HE?
For gaming, the Intel Core i7-11850HE leads with a gaming performance score of 85/100 among AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and Intel Core i7-11850HE.
Which uses less power?
The Intel Core i7-11850HE has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 (55 W), Intel Core i7-11850HE (35 W).
Do AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and Intel Core i7-11850HE use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485: FP11, Intel Core i7-11850HE: Intel BGA 1787), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which is faster in multi-core benchmarks?
The Intel Core i7-11850HE posts the highest multi-core benchmark score. Multi-core results: Intel Core i7-11850HE (19,000). Benchmark figures are approximate and workload-dependent.