CPU Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C vs Intel Core Ultra 5 332
A side-by-side comparison of specs, performance and value. The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C is a 15 W, 4‑core/8‑thread Chromebook SoC from AMD’s Mendocino family, built on a 6 nm Zen 2 CPU core and an RDNA 2 Radeon 610M iGPU, designed to bring modern performance and long battery life to mainstream Chromebooks.
The Bottom Line
Overview & Launch
Specifications Compared
Performance Compared
Productivity
Gaming
Virtualization
Efficiency
Specialized Performance
AI / ML
- No dedicated AI accelerator; inference relies on CPU/iGPU
- Fine for on‑device Chrome OS AI features, not for heavy ML workloads
- 46 TOPS NPU5 for efficient on‑device AI
- Good for Windows Studio Effects and local AI assistants
- Not aimed at large‑scale model training
Content Creation
Gaming
- Radeon 610M with only 2 CUs limits gaming potential
- Suitable for 2D, e‑sports, and older titles at low settings
- Not aimed at AAA gaming or high refresh rate gameplay
- 2‑core Xe3 iGPU is entry‑level for gaming
- Suitable for eSports and older titles at 1080p
- Not intended for AAA gaming at high settings
Industry Impact
Best CPU by Use Case
Target Audience
Strengths & Weaknesses
Pros
- 4 cores / 8 threads at 15 W, a clear upgrade over dual‑core Chromebook SoCs
- High boost up to 4.3 GHz for snappy Chrome OS responsiveness
- RDNA 2 Radeon 610M with modern feature set and hardware video decode
- 6 nm process and 15 W TDP enable fanless designs and long battery life
- Dual‑channel LPDDR5‑5500 improves both CPU and iGPU performance
Cons
- Only 4 PCIe 3.0 lanes; NVMe speed and expandability are limited
- Radeon 610M has just 2 CUs, restricting gaming and GPU compute potential
- Max memory officially limited to 16 GB, typical of budget Chromebooks
- No unlocked multiplier; no overclocking support
- Zen 2 CPU architecture is several generations old behind Zen 4/Zen 5
Pros
- Strong AI capabilities with 46 TOPS NPU5
- vPro enterprise security and manageability
- Efficient 18A process for good battery life
- Modern I/O including PCIe 5.0, Thunderbolt 4, Wi‑Fi 7
- Full AV1 encode/decode and modern display outputs
Cons
- Only 6 cores / 6 threads limits heavy multi‑tasking and rendering
- 2‑core Xe3 iGPU is entry‑level for gaming and GPU compute
- No overclocking headroom
- Higher‑core Panther Lake SKUs offer significantly more multi‑threaded performance
Competitors & Alternatives
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C
- Intel Core i3‑N305Rival
Chromebook / Entry-Level Laptop
- AMD Ryzen 3 7320CRival
Chromebook
- AMD Ryzen 5 5625CRival
Chromebook (Barcelo‑R)
- Intel Core i3‑1315U (in Chromebooks)Rival
Chromebook / Mainstream Laptop
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2Rival
Chromebook (ARM)
- Intel Core i3‑N305 ChromebookAlt
Strong multi‑core performance and good efficiency; better if you prefer Intel or need more E‑cores.
- AMD Ryzen 5 5625C ChromebookAlt
Older but with more L3 cache and stronger CPU performance if you need more headroom for heavier apps.
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 ChromebookAlt
Always‑connected ARM‑based alternative if you value LTE/5G and all‑day battery over x86 compatibility.
- Older Ryzen 5 4500U/5500U ChromebooksAlt
Used or discounted models may offer more cores and cache if you can tolerate DDR4 and lower efficiency.
Intel Core Ultra 5 332
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840HSRival
Mainstream Mobile (Zen 4, 8 cores / 16 threads)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 335Rival
Mainstream Mobile (4P+4LP‑E, 8 cores)
- Compare head-to-headIntel Core Ultra 5 325Rival
Mainstream Mobile (4P+4LP‑E, 8 cores, higher clocks)
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640HSRival
Mainstream Mobile (Zen 4, 6 cores / 12 threads)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 PlusRival
Arm‑based Always Connected PC
- Intel Core Ultra 7 355HAlt
Higher‑end Panther Lake SKU with more cores and a stronger iGPU if you need better creator or gaming performance.
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225UAlt
Lower‑power Lunar Lake alternative if you prioritize maximum battery life over AI TOPS and vPro features.
Our Verdict on Each
A solid step up from older dual‑core Chromebook chips, with competitive CPU performance and modern RDNA 2 graphics, but limited by a small GPU and no upgrade path beyond typical Chromebook constraints.
Best for: Buying a Chromebook Plus or mainstream Chromebook where you want better CPU and iGPU performance than older Intel or AMD dual‑core designs, without sacrificing battery life.
Read the full reviewA capable, efficiency‑focused mobile chip for business and mainstream laptops, offering strong AI and security features via NPU5 and vPro, but not aimed at heavy creators or gamers who need more cores and a stronger iGPU.
Best for: Business or mainstream laptop with vPro, where AI features, security, and battery life matter more than heavy multi‑thread performance or high‑end gaming.
Read the full reviewFrequently Asked Questions
Which is better, AMD Ryzen 5 7520C or Intel Core Ultra 5 332?
Based on our editorial ratings, the Intel Core Ultra 5 332 comes out ahead with a score of 8.2/10. That said, the best choice depends on your workload — check the spec and performance breakdown above for gaming, productivity and efficiency differences.
Which is faster for gaming, AMD Ryzen 5 7520C or Intel Core Ultra 5 332?
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 5 332 leads with a gaming performance score of 60/100 among AMD Ryzen 5 7520C and Intel Core Ultra 5 332.
Which uses less power?
The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C has the lowest rated TDP. Power draw across these chips: AMD Ryzen 5 7520C (15 W), Intel Core Ultra 5 332 (25 W).
Do AMD Ryzen 5 7520C and Intel Core Ultra 5 332 use the same socket?
No. They use different sockets (AMD Ryzen 5 7520C: FT6, Intel Core Ultra 5 332: FCBGA2540), so each needs a compatible motherboard.
Which has more cores?
The Intel Core Ultra 5 332 has the most cores. Core counts: AMD Ryzen 5 7520C (4 cores), Intel Core Ultra 5 332 (6 cores).